In China, “democracy,” “democratic parties,” “June 4” and even “6.4” are labeled “sensitive terms.” A massive Internet review system automatically replaces such terms with the words “sensitive term,” making it sometimes impossible to post certain phrases. For example, it would likely be impossible to say, “China’s economy has grown by 6.4 percent.”
When Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) chatted with Internet users during an interview on the Chinese government’s official Web site and the Xinhua news agency’s Web site on Feb. 27, he said: “Only in a democracy is political order guaranteed even if there is a leadership change.”
On some Web sites, this was changed to “only in a sensitive term is political order guaranteed even if there is a leadership change.”
I had always thought that this was a strictly Chinese phenomenon, but to my surprise, sensitive terms also exist in free and democratic Taiwan.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration consider the words “nation’s founding” in the phrase “the 100th anniversary of the nation’s founding” (建國一百年) one such sensitive term, and it was therefore changed to “100 years of excellence” (精彩一百年) in connection to the centennial celebration of the founding of the Republic of China (ROC).
In fact, in its dealings with China, the administration has begun to check its own language to define a set of sensitive terms and topics, such as “president,” “Tibet” and “Taiwan is an independent and sovereign state.”
There are also other examples. The head of China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait addressed Ma as “Mr Ma,” while the government has gone even further by not issuing entry visas to people who are not welcome in China, such as the Dalai Lama and World Uyghur Congress president Rebiya Kadeer.
In the past, Ma often talked about the June 4 movement and freedom and human rights in Tibet, but that stopped after he became president; instead, he has praised China’s human rights record.
It seems these issues have also been labeled “sensitive terms” as the government synchronizes its stance with that of China’s. If this continues, maybe “democracy” will be next on the list of sensitive terms. And when the list gets too long, maybe they’ll just replace such words with the phrase “sensitive term.”
If statements by the Taiwanese government were only filtered out on Web sites in China, there would be no problem.
However, if the government begins to censor itself, then the freedom, democracy and human rights the Taiwanese have fought so hard and so long for will have been all but destroyed.
Taiwan is a democratic example to all Chinese around the world. Regardless of complaints about Taiwan’s political chaos, Taiwan, is undeniably a democracy. The more Taiwan insists on its independence, the deeper the understanding of the value of democracy among Chinese around the world.
Lately, China has increased pressure on Hong Kong, its showcase for the “one country, two systems” model. Taiwan’s persistence will strengthen the efforts of Hong Kong’s democracy activists.
Chances are that China will also celebrate the 100th anniversary of the 1911 Xinhai Revolution that toppled the Qing Dynasty, but the ROC government must emphatically not sacrifice the nation’s sovereignty just because it wants China’s economy to save Taiwan.
The 100th anniversary of the nation’s founding must not be allowed to become the “100th anniversary of the sensitive term.”
Hsu Chien-jung is a doctoral candidate at Monash University in Australia.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations