Twenty months into his term, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has seen his approval ratings tumble almost monthly, with the latest poll by Global Views magazine’s survey research center hitting a new low of 23.2 percent.
In an obvious attempt to woo back supporters, Ma traveled to Hualien on Sunday and paid a special visit to Chiang Mei-hua (江美華), a Ma fan who drew the attention of the media — and the Presidential Office — after her son disclosed on his blog that his mom had lost her admiration for Ma because of the government’s poor performance.
An obviously thrilled Chiang said after Ma’s visit that the president was now back among her top three idols, along with Hong Kong movie star Andy Lau (劉德華) and South Korean star Bae Yong-joon. Obviously the other two men have never given a disappointing performance in her books.
It is good to see Ma respond to his sinking popularity.
However, while it may be satisfying to know he can still charm older women who idolize him — and the rest of his legion of female fans — Ma should remember that as head of state, the competence of his government is what matters.
Ma should work on improving the government’s performance as a whole instead of trying to charm his way out of public dissatisfaction.
In an interview with the Taipei Times last week, Ma reiterated his pledge to be the “people’s president” (全民總統), rejecting criticism that having doubled up as Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman he had become a “pan-blue president,” placing partisan interests above public concerns.
A glance at his planned itinerary, however, suggests otherwise.
The KMT has announced that after Ma returns from his current Latin American trip, he will begin a nationwide tour next month in his capacity as KMT chairman to campaign for party candidates as well as to seek better communication with local party members.
Visits to several juancun (眷村), or veterans’ villages, are planned. This party tour will be stretched out over several months in the run-up to the special municipality elections at the end of the year.
It appears that Ma is focusing his attention on rallying KMT supporters to consolidate their sympathy for him.
If Ma really saw himself as a “people’s president,” he would be paying attention to things of far greater importance than the feelings of uncommitted voters in by-elections.
What Ma may have yet to realize is that the true crisis in his administration lies not in the short-term temper tantrum thrown by his supporters, but in the spreading lack of confidence the public has in the government as a whole.
If Ma is only interested in appeasing pan-blue supporters and remains oblivious to the rest, he will continue to disappoint the majority, which in turn will lead to further damage to his approval ratings.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS