President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has pledged several times to divest the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of its assets and donate the proceeds to charity.
This, however, falls far short of the public’s expectations. Returning these stolen assets to the national treasury would be the correct way of displaying how determined the party is to reform.
Since Ma has made it clear that the party will rely on donations for funding in accordance with the Political Donation Act (政治獻金法), he could even win praise by acting with grace and resolving the matter as soon as possible.
Let’s put aside the messy accounts of the three KMT-affiliated companies — China Television Company, Central Pictures Corporation and Broadcasting Corporation of China — because no one understands them. Also, is there anyone who can get his head around what is happening with the party’s NT$20 billion (US$625 million) sale of the Central Investment Holding Co?
After deducting party operation costs of NT$18 billion, the party will be left with only NT$2 billion. Saying that the party will donate this sum to welfare is a complete joke.
Ma pretends he does not know what is going on and plays number games while ignoring public demands for the party to return its assets to the treasury.
For example, initial party estimates show that the KMT needs in excess of NT$1.5 billion a year to cover personnel and associated costs, including about NT$700 million for retirement funds for party members and administration; about NT$600 million to cover the salaries of current staff; and about NT$200 million for miscellaneous costs.
The KMT says it has a three-phase plan for handling party assets and that it expects to complete the sale of Central Investment Holding Co before June. It has also said it will reduce staff in one sweeping move.
Who is interested in the finer details of the KMT’s housekeeping? Citing all these numbers is simply a way of pulling the wool over everyone’s eyes.
Political parties in democratic nations cannot own businesses. This is essential to preventing unfair competition. With the KMT’s advantage as the ruling party, there is no need for them to worry about raising funds.
Following Taiwan’s democratization and economic liberalization, KMT assets have been the focus of widespread criticism. Because of the party’s procrastination, its billions in assets have gradually disappeared thanks to a lack of clear legislation.
In no time, these assets have evaporated; all that remains is the Central Investment Holding Co.
Now the party is getting even craftier and wants us to believe that it only has NT$2 billion to donate to charity after deducting party expenses. Who believes this nonsense?
This is Ma’s second time around as KMT chairman; both times he has promised to return the party’s assets.
There have also been recent reports that he would release a final plan for handling the issue, but these were referring only to a list of principles and guidelines.
So, when the KMT talks about eliminating party assets, it really means liquidating them or shifting them to people or groups with close ties to the KMT and claiming that the party has no more interest in the matter.
The only way to dispel public doubt and handle the issue correctly is to return the money to the treasury.
Lu I-ming is the former publisher and president of Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
Translated by Eddy Chang and Drew Cameron
A Facebook post by Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) earlier this month achieved record levels of engagement — although perhaps inadvertently. In it, he attacked Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator and Taipei mayoral candidate Puma Shen (沈伯洋) for an op-ed published in 2014 discussing drug harm reduction policies. In attempting to stir up fear with talk of community centers, drugs and needles, Chiang’s comment section exploded. More than 100,000 comments poured in within the first two hours; more than 330,000 after the first 12; and more than 400,000 by noon the following day. Rather embarrassingly, many commenters made a point
Southeast Asian food delivery platform Grab Holdings Ltd in March applied to acquire Delivery Hero SE’s Foodpanda operations in Taiwan, with the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) scheduled to announce its decision on Oct. 27. On the surface, the deal is a business merger — but in substance, it involves personal data, national geospatial information and digital sovereignty. It cannot be assessed solely in terms of market share and price competition. Grab has extensive and long-standing connections to Chinese capital. In 2015, Chinese ride-hailing firm Didi Chuxing and China Investment Corp, a sovereign wealth fund, invested in Grab. Grab invested in Chinese autonomous-driving
The official English name for Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator and Taipei mayoral candidate Puma Shen’s (沈伯洋) campaign is “the Taipei Current.” It comes from the Chinese term yangliu (洋流), a direct translation of which would be “Ocean Wave,” using the last character of Shen’s name, yang (洋, “ocean”). The Chinese term is a reference to the 2018 campaign for Kaohsiung mayor that swept a hitherto marginal player within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), who is now legislative speaker, whose successful campaign then was termed the “Han Wave” (韓流). Shen’s usage of the Chinese term is intentional.
The relocation of Taipei International Airport (Songshan Airport), which Taipei mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) proposed on Thursday, has been debated for years. Mayoral candidates have previously advocated preserving the site as a park and green space, which I would have no objection to. However, plans for the site to undergo intensive development would risk overloading the land’s carrying capacity and seriously exacerbate the severity of potential earthquakes. While a major offshore megathrust earthquake would severely affect Taipei and New Taipei City, movement along the Shanchiao Fault (山腳斷層) could mean an earthquake or subsidence event taking place right underneath the city,
RSS