The two “China” parties — the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — say they only want what is best for Taiwan when it comes to trade and economic exchanges across the Taiwan Strait. Chinese officials have even said that Taiwanese businesspeople go to China to make money off the backs of the Chinese.
However, Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) and SEF Secretary-General Kao Koong-lian (高孔廉) have exposed the claims for the lies that they are. Chiang has said that “over the past 20 years, Taiwanese investment in China has exceeded NT$4.8 trillion [US$148.7 billion], and so it cannot be denied that China’s economic growth owes a lot to Taiwanese businesspeople.” Kao has said that “Taiwan was opened up to Chinese investment in June, but to date, investments only stand at NT$1.19 billion, not a very large sum.”
Putting it more bluntly, investment by Taiwanese businesspeople in China is a bit like trying to scare off dogs by throwing food at them. As Chinese officials would have it, Taiwanese businesspeople enjoy preferential investment conditions in China, as if to say that Taiwan is enjoying unilateral benefits while China is making sacrifices for the sake of Taiwan.
What is the reality? China-bound Taiwanese investors are sacrificing Taiwan and helping China achieve its goals.
Over the past 20 years, Taiwan’s economic development has dropped to negative growth, unemployment has reached new heights with no signs of falling and salaries have fallen to the levels of 13 years ago, while China’s economy continues to grow at double-digit rates. It is also rapidly increasing the number of missiles it has aimed at Taiwan and claims that it will “buy Taiwan.” The question is whether this situation is beneficial to Taiwan, or to China.
As far as the government is concerned, Chinese investment in Taiwan is limited, and the way to deal with this is to deregulate even more areas. This is suicidal. We must not place any hope in Chinese investment: The more there is, the greater the danger to Taiwan. On the one hand, Chinese investment is fueling housing prices and the stock market, increasing the suffering of Taiwanese while doing nothing to create local employment. On the other hand, these investments are used to buy up Taiwanese businesses and gradually gain control over the economy. Chinese are even buying up media outlets through returning Taiwanese businesspeople to promote unification and oppose independence. Their involvement in local elections is even more frightening.
Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) responded to Chiang and Kao by saying that many Chinese businesspeople have told him they are worried about frequent protests in Taiwan, which they find frightening.
However, Beijing has total control over whether there will be any Chinese investment in Taiwan, and whether Chinese money will flow in or out of Taiwan. The best example of this is when the Chinese government banned Chinese tourists from visiting Kaohsiung after the Australian documentary about exiled Uighur leader Rebiya Kadeer was screened at the Kaohsiung Film Festival earlier this year.
In the same way, Chinese investments are used to whet the appetite of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and entice him to make even more concessions so that China can gain leverage over Taiwan’s sovereignty in the same way that it has gained leverage in the Taiwanese economy.
It is worth noting that China feels the NT$4.8 trillion it has attracted from Taiwanese businesses is not enough. Chen said that if traditional small and medium-sized companies in southern Taiwan cooperated with privately run companies in Jiangsu or Zhejiang provinces, they could work together to make their money off foreigners.
This may be true, but while Chinese companies would be guaranteed to turn a profit, the companies from southern Taiwan would be more likely to be guaranteed endless suffering and problems. If they were to cooperate with Chinese companies, workers in southern Taiwan would become dependent on Chinese officials for their paychecks, and that could change the political landscape in southern Taiwan.
Chen has been called the main culprit behind the persecution of Taiwanese businesspeople in China by those who have suffered such problems. Now he has been in Taiwan to ply his trade. Doesn’t that make the government his accomplices?
Those who harbor illusions about Chinese investments in Taiwan should remember the painful lesson learned by many Taiwanese businesses that invested in China and sacrificed Taiwan over the past 20 years only to help China achieve its goals while themselves struggling to survive. Taiwanese are increasingly questioning the proposed cross-strait economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA), and in an opinion poll conducted by the Chinese-language Wealth Magazine, 29 percent of respondents supported signing an ECFA, while 54 percent worried that they or members of their family would lose their jobs after such an agreement is signed.
This is clear evidence that the public isn’t fooled so easily. Taiwan and China have moved closer over the past 20 years, and investments and trade have increased. The resulting factor price equalization has led to Taiwanese salaries and incomes being pulled down by China. Ma is well aware of this, but he still persists in pushing for closer economic and trade relations with China, and mobilized a massive police force to protect Chen during his visit, which was aimed at attracting more Taiwanese businesspeople as a part of China’s unification strategy. The only explanation is that he wants to thoroughly equalize Taiwan and China to pave the way for eventual unification, which would stifle and kill Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
RSS