When Taiwanese officials signed up to take part in next year’s Shanghai World Expo, there was always the probability that the Chinese would use Taipei’s participation to promote Taiwan as Chinese territory.
After all, this is the distorted view of reality that the Chinese government has relentlessly tried to impose on people in every corner of the globe over the last few decades.
So when officials discovered this week that, contrary to the contract signed by the two sides, Expo organizers had included Taiwan in the China Pavilion on their Web site, it shouldn’t have come as a surprise.
Nevertheless, protests were made, and although the organizers made hasty alterations to the Chinese Web pages (the English Web page still has Taiwan in the Chinese Pavilion), it is hard to believe this will be the last attempt to promote Taiwan as part of China during the event.
Although this would seem like a trivial matter to most people outside Taiwan, it is just the latest example of China’s long history of paying lip service to agreements it has signed.
Another recent example would be the Chinese government’s reneging on its commitment to provide uncensored Internet access to journalists during the Beijing Olympics.
Ever since its proclamation in 1949, the People’s Republic of China has made a habit of ignoring the terms of pacts and agreements it has forged.
The Seventeen Point agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet guaranteeing religious freedom and autonomy for Tibetans signed in 1951 is one of the earliest instances of this behavior.
In 1998, China signed the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Yet just this week Chinese police charged dissident Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) with subverting state power. His crime? Publishing a document calling for democratic reform, a goal fully in line with the articles contained in the covenant.
More recently, Taiwan and China have signed a number of cross-strait agreements on food safety and fighting crime, for example, yet Taiwan has seen little or no action from Beijing on repatriation of wanted white-collar criminals or compensation for last year’s exports of poisoned milk powder.
Time and again China has demonstrated that it cannot be trusted, yet the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government ignores this and plows ahead, signing ever more agreements.
That China cannot be counted on to implement such agreements in full, or may even renege on them completely, bodes ill for Taiwan’s future as the present government becomes more entwined with Beijing.
Still, there are those in the government that want to go even further, talking of military confidence-building measures, political talks and even a peace agreement.
These people are stretching the boundaries of credibility if they believe Beijing can be trusted to stick to the terms of important agreements, especially on a subject as sensitive as Taiwan.
The probability is even higher that, as in the case of the Shanghai Expo, the inclusion of Taiwan under China will have serious implications for this nation.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS