Oct. 24 marked Taiwan’s third United Nations Day.
The initiation of the campaign to join the UN under the name “Taiwan” was a significant milestone on the road toward normalizing Taiwan’s national status. In 2007, then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) filed an application with the UN Secretariat for Taiwanese UN membership under the name “Taiwan,” an approach that was completely different from that used in the previous 14 years.
It was an historic step forward in that it declared to the international community that Taiwan is a peace-loving country determined to join the world body.
The move also highlighted the fact that by not including Taiwan as a member, the UN had deprived Taiwanese of basic human rights and that this was not good for Taiwan or the UN.
Since Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) became president last year, there has been a drastic change in the government’s strategy for joining the UN.
In order to ingratiate itself with the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the Ma administration has declared a “diplomatic truce” with Beijing, promoted a modus vivendi foreign policy and striven for “meaningful participation” in the UN’s specialized agencies instead.
This year, the government even gave up efforts to have Taiwan’s diplomatic allies make a joint proposal for Taiwanese UN membership at the UN General Assembly. Ma instead implored China to allow Taiwan to participate in specialized agencies — reflecting a status inferior to that of independent states.
Not only does the Ma government do all it can to avoid suggesting that Taiwan is a sovereign, independent state and that China has no jurisdiction over Taiwan, it is also failing to defend Taiwan’s national interests.
Ma’s attempts to undermine the nation’s sovereignty and its Taiwanese identity by placing Taiwan’s future in the hands of the Chinese are indicative of his ignorance of public opinion and their wish for UN membership.
They also highlight how the government disregards Taiwanese sovereignty and bows to its Chinese counterpart in an attempt to make Taiwan a Chinese satellite state.
In 2007, Taiwan’s proposal for UN membership aroused heated discussion among members of the world body and in the international community, leading to massive media coverage.
This year, however, the Ma administration abandoned efforts to gain UN membership and has significantly reduced exposure for Taiwan’s attempts to gain participation in the UN in the international media, thus weakening Taiwan’s voice in that arena.
We must insist on doing what is right. The Taiwanese people are not willing to be ruled by a foreign power and we are not pessimistic about the collective right of Taiwan’s 23 million people to join the UN.
Nor will we give up.
Chen Lung-chu is president of the Taiwan New Century Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with