Since he came to office in May last year, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) pro-China policies have become so transparent that a US-based satirical magazine was prompted to compare cross-strait relations to courtship, with Ma “wooing China.”
It would be unfair, however, to look down at the magazine for making a political analogy so absurd as to belittle Taiwan, for in his words and deeds over the past year-and-a-half, Ma has encouraged this very image, especially for those looking in from the outside.
Not only has Ma openly — and repeatedly — praised his Chinese counterpart, President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), but he has also credited Beijing for the most absurd ephemera, such as allowing him to open the Kaohsiung World Games.
Undeterred by reality, Ma has gone as far as saying that he hoped the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) would one day nurture “its own Hu Jintao.”
Apparently interpreting the magazine’s sarcasm in labeling him one of the “gutsiest” world leaders as flattery, Ma took his “China wooing” even further on Monday.
In a speech at a memorial service for the victims of Typhoon Morakot, “gutsy” Ma went beyond expressing gratitude to the many volunteers, soldiers and foreign governments for their hard work and donations during relief operations by making sure that a certain country received extra praise.
“The Mainland authorities’ and Chinese compatriots’ zealous contributions have so far amounted to donations that exceed NT$5 billion [US$152.9 million], the single-largest donation [Taiwan has received] from overseas,” Ma said.
“This shows that blood is thicker than water among the people across the Taiwan Strait. I hope people across the Taiwan Strait will continue to learn from each other and share experiences in disaster relief and reconstruction work.”
If a donation of NT$5 billion from the world’s third-largest economy can earn China such praise, what about the generosity shown by Tuvalu, Taiwan’s diplomatic ally? Despite the poor state of its economy, the small South Pacific nation donated 1 percent of its GDP, or about US$210,000, to help Taiwan with relief work. To put things in perspective, 1 percent of China’s GDP would represent US$79 billion.
Was Tuvalu’s generosity not worthy of special mention by the president?
If, by Ma’s logic, Beijing’s donations were proof that “blood is thicker than water,” this still cannot explain the 1,500 or so missiles that China continues to aim at Taiwan, nor the new weapons systems that it is acquiring and developing that one day could be used against this nation and its people.
Here we have a president who showers Beijing with compliments greatly disproportionate to the so-called “goodwill” it has shown, while downplaying the threat that China continues to represent to our security and way of life.
If only Ma were an exception in his administration.
Sadly, others, such as Straits Exchange Foundation Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤), have engaged in similar doublespeak, with comments such as “Taiwan owes China a debt of gratitude” because of its donations in the wake of Morakot.
Taiwanese only have themselves to blame if foreign media make fun of a small nation whose leaders bend over backwards to create an illusion of peace in the Taiwan Strait.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS