Zhou Yao, aged about six, beams at the camera as she poses in a garden. Then she is a confident nine-year-old, hands on hips, head cocked.
At 14, she is deliberately pensive, with the self-consciousness of a girl who knows she will soon become a woman.
That photograph is the last one in her mother’s pile. There will be no more.
Yao’s casket of ashes now stands in her parents’ home in Dujiangyan. They found her body hours after the Juyuan Middle School collapsed in the earthquake on Monday last week.
Like families across Sichuan Province, her parents are angry and disbelieving.
Almost 7,000 classrooms across the quake zone were destroyed, the government has acknowledged.
Thousands of children were entombed as they studied. Hundreds of children are believed to have died in Juyuan and at another school across town.
Similar numbers were trapped in the wreckage of seven schools in Mianzhu, the middle school at Beichuan and a high school in Shifang County. The toll is staggering, even in a province that has seen so much death.
In Beichuan, the whole town was devastated; only a handful of single-story buildings seem to have survived. But in Dujiangyan, the distress of parents is magnified by the fact that most buildings — even those directly next to the collapsed schools — still stand.
Passions have become so inflamed that the government has pledged to investigate claims of shoddy construction, possibly linked to corruption, and to severely punish those responsible. It has even fielded the questions of grieving parents online, a remarkable act of openness.
“The tragedy has happened and I have to face up to it. We just want justice,” said Yao’s mother, Wang Fengying, her reddened face smeared with tears.
Amid exercise books and school textbooks, she pulled out a certificate of merit for excelling in exams. Competition for entry at Juyuan was fierce and Yao had to fight her way in.
“Chinese, math and English — she got good marks in all of them,” her mother said. “The school gave them a very good education. But the quality of the buildings was very bad.”
Stacking up the schoolbooks again in a basket, she slumped with grief.
“I have a strong character, but when I see these I feel crushed. I want to burn them but I can’t make up my mind to do it,” she said. “I could overcome any difficulties, but not this one.”
Yao’s brother flicked through the pages of a schoolbook listlessly; he helped to dig his little sister out of the rubble. The family is convulsed with grief, her grandmother choking on sobs. Even the infant son of a watching neighbor is solemn.
“All the innocent lives were taken by this big disaster. We want an explanation from the school,” Wang said. “Children are the future of the nation. But the school didn’t treasure them. The teacher came here, but the officials haven’t even sent their condolences.”
Parents with no history of challenging authority are determined that someone must account for their loss.
Just up the road at the town’s crematorium, a mother sitting by the ashes of her 11-year-old daughter showed us mobile phone images of the wreckage from Xinjian Elementary School. She did not want to give her name, but was eager to talk.
“All the parents are angry. Look, there’s no steel in the concrete. We want to fight for justice together, that’s why we took these pictures,” she said. “We’ve been collecting evidence and taking samples. The debris was basically sand — not even pieces of concrete.”
She alleged that experts had warned local officials three years ago that both the destroyed schools were poorly constructed and potentially dangerous — a claim that is impossible to verify and that may simply reflect the speed with which rumors rattle around this angry community. What is certain is that concern about the collapse of so many schools has resonated far beyond the bereaved.
“We cannot afford not to raise uneasy questions about the structural quality of school buildings,” the English-language China Daily noted shortly after the quake.
The columnist Zhang Jinghua (張京華) was more pointed in the Economic Observer.
“We saw elegant government buildings remain intact while dozens of schools crumbled like houses of sand,” he wrote.
High-tech manufacturing in India, backed by billions of dollars in government subsidies, has attracted cheerleaders and critics. Optimists point to Apple Inc’s decision to build an alternative supply chain to hedge against China. A quarter of all iPhones now roll out of factories near Chennai, employing tens of thousands. Skeptics counter that much of this manufacturing is mere final assembly — screwdriver work that adds little value. The fact that a much smaller economy such as Vietnam exports more merchandise shows that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s “Make in India” initiative remains more hype than reality, they said. One way to settle
Taiwan heads to the polls next month for local elections. Beneath the campaign ads lies a deeper question: What do we call this place and who gets to decide? In the pages of the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), that question has been playing out across three centuries. The entries for “Formosa” and “Taiwan” chart an island’s journey from colonial fantasy to self-named reality. Names are rarely neutral; they are the first act of possession. Nowhere is this more evident than in the OED, where the two entries serve as a linguistic seismograph for one of the world’s most enduring geopolitical fault lines.
Only 107,812 babies were born in Taiwan last year, barely half the number recorded in 2016. The nation is now a super-aged society, with more than one-fifth of its population aged 65 or older. The National Development Council forecast that the population could fall from an estimated 23.2 million this year to just 12.1 million in 2075. The decline in the working-age population would be even more severe. The number of people aged 15 to 64 is projected to plunge from an estimated 15.8 million this year to 5.1 million by 2075, a reduction of about 67 percent. By then, people
There are two space races that the democracies must win: one to deter military campaigns near Earth, and the other to secure positional deterrence on the Moon and beyond. The good news is that the US is engaged in both races, which will also benefit US allies and partners in Asia, including Taiwan. On Sept. 14, US Air Force Secretary Troy Meink disclosed, “...the US now has on-orbit space control weapons capable of defending the Joint Force against hostile adversary action.” No details about these “space control weapons” have yet been disclosed. However, a graphic apparently issued by French Space Command and posted