In full agreement with all my European colleagues in Taipei, I am sending this public letter on the death penalty.
Wednesday was World Day Against the Death Penalty.
The EU considers abolition of the death penalty a contribution to the enhancement of human dignity and the progressive development of human rights. On this occasion, we therefore call on Taiwan to join the growing list of those that have formally abolished the death penalty and to commute the sentences of those who are on death row.
To date, 90 countries have abolished the death penalty and a further 40 are de facto abolitionists, having not carried out executions in the last 10 years. More than 50 countries have abolished the death penalty since 1990.
Taiwan, a democracy that has paid close attention to the issues of human rights, should join this group. Taiwan's democracy has been a positive example to others in the region. Abolition of the death penalty would again show its leading place within the region as a defender of human rights.
Taiwan has, in recent years, already taken a number of positive steps.
The death penalty is no longer mandatory for any crimes and no execution has taken place since 2005.
We applaud and welcome this progress and urge Taiwan's legislators to take the logical further steps toward full abolition.
To help reach this goal, a report titled Death Penalty in Taiwan: Towards Abolition was published last year by the International Federation for Human Rights, in cooperation with the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty, with funds from the EU.
Many people point to the lack of public support for abolition as the main obstacle to going further. But in nearly all countries (including many in Europe) abolition did not take place with majority public support. Politicians led and public opinion followed.
In the EU it would now be unthinkable for a country to return to using the death penalty and the vast majority of EU citizens would not support such a move.
Those who oppose abolition usually point to a combination of three arguments: retribution, deterrent and cost.
A recent article in The Economist on capital punishment in the US highlighted that the costs of the repeated appeals associated with death row cases make death sentences more expensive than the alternatives.
We know of no comparable data for Taiwan, but we have witnessed the continued, protracted proceedings surrounding such cases here.
The deterrent argument is also not clear-cut. The experience of 130 countries shows that dangerous offenders can be kept safely away from the public without resorting to execution.
Moreover, to point to the deterrent effects of the death penalty, which is focused on a very small number of offenders, is to forget the complex web of factors that influence criminality.
The greatest deterrent to crime is the likelihood that offenders will be apprehended, convicted and punished.
The final argument is that the death penalty is a form of retribution. But the imposition of the death penalty is the ultimate denial of a person's human rights by the authorities. Central to fundamental human rights is that they are inalienable.
Human rights apply to the worst of us as well as to the best of us, which is why they protect all of us. An execution cannot be used to condemn killing; it is killing.
And the death penalty is non-reversible. Courts are not infallible and mistakes do occur. The death penalty removes not only the victim's right to seek redress for wrongful conviction, but also the judicial system's capacity to correct its errors.
In short, none of the practical arguments that are used to justify the death penalty are strong and the moral arguments against it are fundamental.
We again acknowledge the progress that Taiwan has made, but reiterate our call for it to take the further steps required to formally abolish the death penalty.
Jean-Claude Poimboeuf
Director,
French Institute in Taipei
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused