The opposition parties are living in the past.
How else can one explain the resurrection of the 319 Shooting Truth Investigation Special Committee on Tuesday? It is more than two years since the presidential election, and the pan-blues have put Taiwan right back where it started.
No one has ever presented a shred of credible evidence to prove that the shooting was a conspiracy. This is such a vital fact that it warrants repetition: No one has presented evidence of a conspiracy.
Not one document. Not one fiber of fabric. Not a single hair. Not one strand of DNA. No film footage. No still photographs. No weapons. No testimony from inside sources. No tape recordings. No fingerprints. No eyewitnesses. Nothing.
Nothing at all to indicate that the elected president of this democratic state, flawed as it may be, was involved in a conspiracy that would have required dozens, if not hundreds, of participants to execute properly -- with no certainty of what effect it would have on the election once it had been carried out.
That's another point that should be raised twice to emphasize its importance: If President Chen Shui-bian (
If he wanted to make sure he stayed in power, why didn't he just declare martial law? Ban the main opposition leaders from running? Stuff the ballot boxes? He could have done hundreds of things that would have guaranteed the result, while giving the appearance of a democratic contest.
But according to the conspiracy-peddlers, he didn't. He had someone give him a flesh wound with a homemade pistol, then covered it up and waited a day for the poll results.
It is insulting to one's intelligence to be asked to believe that.
Furthermore, evidence that the shooting was carried out by a lone nutcase is legion. The police collected bullet fragments. Shell casings. Video footage. Eyewitness testimony. Forensic analysis by a host of experts. The police spent months painstakingly gathering evidence and tracking down leads. They matched clothing. They positively identified the shooter. They found the man who sold him a homemade gun. They gathered testimony from people who knew the shooter. Even his family said he had done it -- until deciding a year later to change their story, with the help of a prominent pan-blue figure.
And what about the simple, inescapable logic of self-interest? Is there no one, inside or outside of the president's circle of trust, who would have something to gain by exposing a conspiracy that would rock the very foundations of this country's political system?
Are the thousands of broadcast and print journalists in on the plot as well? Are they all Chen supporters? Clearly not. So were they all bought off?
Why did the pan-blue camp's first unconstitutional committee not find any conclusive proof of their claim? They submitted a voluminous report that was a cold fish even among pan-blue supporters. It had charts. It had diagrams. It had speculation. It had lots of pages. But it had no evidence.
So was the committee in on the conspiracy too?
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is again showing its disregard for the rule of law, merely because it can't live with the reality that it isn't in power.
KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
The public is sick of sham conspiracy theories.
It's time for the pan-blues to put up or shut up.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS