With polls showing Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Both Ma and Wang were criticized by the DPP for their conservative pro-China stances. But given the constituency they are competing for, anything else could hardly be expected. It was inevitable that Ma should make his ritual denunciation of Taiwan's independence. But it was interesting to note that he also pointed out that "one country, two systems" was unacceptable to Taiwan. This was encouraging. Of course, Ma was only saying what is true, but that was unusual in itself for a party where lies usually compete with pipe dreams for prominence.
While Lien has not actually endorsed "one country, two systems," he has not been willing to frankly spell out its unacceptability to China. Ma on the other hand has been something of a thorn in China's side on the erosion of democratic standards in Hong Kong and its human-rights situation in general. Ma, it appears, will want to tread a fine line between stressing Taiwan's Chineseness (during his terms as mayor he has been a tireless promoter of "mainland Chinese" cultural forms and activities) and his apparent dislike of the government and political system of contemporary China. Since the Chinese Communist Party has no intention of changing in any significant way, Ma's chairmanship of the KMT might result in an expected froideur between two parties which have, under Lien's misguided leadership, been hand in glove.
Another area which surprised was Ma's attitude toward the KMT's assets. Ma came out quite strongly against the KMT's holding on to any "illegal" assets. This was interesting because the KMT has claimed that it has no illegal assets, despite a Control Yuan investigation establishing that it stole over 400 properties from the state. Ma seems ready to admit there are illegally acquired assets and that these assets should be restored to their rightful owners. He claimed that the KMT had a right to defend its legally acquired assets, which of course it does. But given the Control Yuan's findings and Ma's legal background, it will be interesting to see how he interprets what is "legally acquired." Given his reputation for opposing corruption -- the zeal over which lost him his post as justice minister nearly a decade ago -- some might expect Ma to be honest about the KMT's ill-gotten gains and give them back. But it should also be pointed out that Ma appears to have been quite happy to tolerate the high level of corruption among his political allies in Taipei during his mayorship, as well as frequently sheltering his people from the consequences of their administrative incompetence.
"Reform is not just a slogan," Ma said on Sunday. So far, under Lien, it has been. Remember the farce about putting the KMT's assets into trust? And can Ma really make good on his promise? Certainly nobody expects reform from his opponent, Wang, -- the party's bagman-in-chief for nearly a decade.
Initial opposition in the party to Ma's campaign was based on fear that his lack of tolerance for corruption would step on too many toes. If he is serious, Ma's chairmanship could be very interesting indeed.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
RSS