On your editorials page I found an article about France that I think is simply unacceptable. Seldom have I read such an obvious example of pure hate and hostility against a foreign nation.
How dare you call all French people liars and suggest making it impossible for them to come to Taiwan, or do business with your country? How dare you express such arrogance against millions of people who definitely do not support selling arms to China (or, for that matter, any country), even if their government might act differently? I am not French, but I have many French friends who do not agree with French President Jacques Chirac. When I lived in Taiwan, I had many French friends who liked your country a whole lot and wouldn't want to see it harmed in any way.
As for myself, I am deeply in love with Taiwan and have very strong feelings about the threats it receives from China. I, too, watch the discussion about the lifting of the arms embargo with great anxiousness. I don't believe that France, or Germany, or the US should sell or even make weapons; I totally agree with you if you point out the dangers of such "trading."
But your arguments, which condemns a whole nation as warlords, seems to me very wrong. By writing like this, you will not be able to gain people's respect; you will not convince the world of Taiwan's needs. You may reach a few narrow-minded nationalists, but I strongly hope -- and believe -- that such people won't change the world. What we need is peace, love, and understanding. Most of all, we need reasonable people who do not get carried away by feelings of hate.
Juliane Hagen
Germany
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
In 1935, the German Reich led by the National Socialist Party officially created the Nuremberg Race Laws, a “legal cage”, for German Jews, stripping them of citizenship, criminalizing their personal relationships, barring them from public life, and transforming them into stateless subjects and isolating them from the rest of society. Similarly, in March 2026, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) National People’s Congress adopted the “Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress” law, which represents the most significant shift in Chinese domestic governance since the era of Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Ostensibly designed as domestic legislation to manage China’s 56 officially recognized ethnic groups,