A Tiananmen activist yesterday told a Hong Kong court that she “totally embraced” actions the prosecution deemed crimes, as closing arguments in her national security trial entered their second day.
Chow Hang-tung (鄒幸彤), 41, is standing trial for “incitement to subversion” along with her former colleague Lee Cheuk-yan (李卓人), 69. They face years behind bars if convicted.
The pair were leaders of the now-defunct Hong Kong Alliance, a group that used to organize candlelight vigils to mark China’s deadly 1989 crackdown on demonstrators in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square. China imposed a National Security Law on the territory in 2020, and the alliance’s leaders were charged the following year and have been behind bars since.
Photo: AFP
Chow, a Cambridge-educated barrister who is representing herself, smiled widely at supporters in the gallery as she entered the courtroom.
Standing in front of a three-judge panel, she said it was a “weird” criminal case, because the defendants did not dispute the facts.
“The defendants fully embraced the actions that the prosecution alleged to be crimes,” Chow told the court, adding that their efforts were an expression of their beliefs.
Photo: AFP
“What is really at dispute is what the law suppresses and what it protects,” she said.
In their closing arguments on Monday, prosecutors accused Chow and Lee of “endangering national security in the name of human rights,” adding that freedom of speech and association are “not absolute rights.”
They said the alliance had repeatedly called to “end one-party rule” in China, which they said amounted to overthrowing or undermining the political system established by the Chinese constitution.
Chow said the group’s stance of “end one-party rule” means “to put an end to a state of unrestrained power.” The Chinese constitution “exists to restrain those in power, not to restrain ordinary people,” she told the court.
“The constitution itself is a tool ... to put an end to various forms of autocracy,” she said, adding that the prosecution’s allegations that the group incited people to contravene the constitution were “completely absurd.”
Lee’s lawyer on Monday said the court must not pay “lip service” to human rights, adding that the right to criticize state organs is protected by China’s constitution.
Lee, who sat quietly in the dock in yesterday’s hearing, had previously denied that “end one-party rule” means overthrowing the Chinese Communist Party’s leadership.
He hoped the party would reform to grant Chinese citizens “the civic rights and happiness they deserved,” Lee told the court in March.
Lee and Chow face a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment.
A third defendant, 74-year-old former lawmaker Albert Ho (何俊仁), pleaded guilty in January.
Rights groups have slammed the trial. Amnesty International deputy regional director Sarah Brooks said in a statement on Monday that “the prosecution’s case relies on vague, overly broad and arbitrary definitions of ‘subversion’” and called for the charges to be dropped.
Urania Chiu, a law lecturer researching Hong Kong at Oxford Brookes University, said the verdict could have wider consequences.
“If the prosecution’s broad and circular understanding of the offense is accepted [by the court], legitimate critiques of Chinese government policies ... however minor, will easily be criminalized,” she said.
Kouri Richins, a Utah mother who published a children’s book about grief after the death of her husband is to serve a life sentence for his murder without the possibility of parole, a judge ruled on Wednesday. Richins was convicted in March of aggravated murder for lacing a cocktail given to her husband, Eric Richins, with five times the lethal dose of fentanyl at their home near Park City in 2022. A jury also found her guilty of four other felonies, including insurance fraud, forgery and attempted murder for trying to poison her husband weeks earlier on Feb. 14, 2022, with a
DELA ROSA CASE: The whereabouts of the senator, who is wanted by the ICC, was unclear, while President Marcos faces a political test over the senate situation Philippine authorities yesterday were seeking confirmation of reports that a top politician wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) had fled, a day after gunfire rang out at the Philippine Senate where he had taken refuge fearing his arrest. Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa, the former national police chief and top enforcer of former Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte’s “war on drugs,” has been under Senate protection and is wanted for crimes against humanity, the same charges Duterte is accused of. “Several sources confirmed that the senator, Senator Bato, is no longer in the Senate premises, but we are still getting confirmation,” Presidential
HELP DENIED? The US Department of State said that the Cuban leadership refuses to allow the US to provide aid to Cubans, ‘who are in desperate need of assistance’ US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday said that Cuba’s leadership must change, as Washington renewed an offer of US$100 million in aid if the communist nation agrees to cooperate. Cuba has been suffering severe economic tumult led by an energy shortage that plunged 65 percent of the country into darkness on Tuesday. Cuba’s leaders have blamed US sanctions, but Rubio, a Cuban American and critic of the government established by Fidel Castro, said the system was to blame, including corruption by the military. “It’s a broken, nonfunctional economy, and it’s impossible to change it. I wish it were different,” he told
Myanmar yesterday published a parliamentary bill proposing the death sentence for those who detain or violently coerce people into working in online scam centers. Internet fraud factories have flourished in Myanmar, part of Southeast Asia’s scam economy, targeting Internet users worldwide with romance and cryptocurrency investment cons. The multibillion-dollar black market attracts many willing employees, but repatriated foreigners have also reported being trafficked to sites in Myanmar and tortured by scam center operators. The draft legislation would allow capital punishment for “violence, torture, unlawful arrest and detention, or cruel treatment against another person for the purpose of forcing them to commit online scams.” The