Australia's Prime Minister John Howard fought to salvage his "Honest John" reputation this week, taking the unusual step of issuing a lengthy rebuttal of the opposition Labor Party's claims that he lied.
With elections on the horizon -- though no date's been set -- Labor recently launched a sustained attack on Howard's credibility.
Over the weekend, Labor issued a so-called ``Truth Overboard'' list of what it claimed were 27 lies Howard has told the electorate during his political career, on topics from taxation to the spread of terrorism following the Iraq invasion.
Howard rebutted them all in a 12-page statement issued Monday night, and struck back by branding the Labor document false and misleading.
"In seeking to portray the prime minister as untruthful it uses selective quotes out of context," Howard said in a statement.
Labor accused Howard of lying when he said in 1995 that a sales tax would ``never ever'' be part of his Liberal Party policy. But he introduced the tax in 2000.
Howard said he had changed his mind, not lied.
"The implication is that a government cannot ever change its mind on policy," Howard said.
Australia's involvement in the Iraq war, with 2,000 troops sent to last year's invasion, has made trust a key factor in the campaign, said Australian National University voting behavior expert Ian McKinley. A majority of Australians had disapproved of the troop deployment.
"In this election campaign, the notion of trust and trust of leadership is going to be one of the most important issues," he said.
"Honest John" was originally a sarcastic tag when it was first attached to Howard during his stint as treasurer in the early 1980s.
But the leader has turned it into a key political asset that characterizes his predictability after 30 years in Parliament, his middle-class values and penchant for talking about issues directly with voters on talk radio shows.
"Truth Overboard" is a play on the so-called "children overboard" controversy, which blew up after the last elections in 2001.
Showcasing phallus-shaped portable shrines and pink penis candies, Japan’s annual fertility festival yesterday teemed with tourists, couples and families elated by its open display of sex. The spring Kanamara Matsuri near Tokyo features colorfully dressed worshipers carrying a trio of giant phallic-shaped objects as they parade through the street with glee. The festival, as legend has it, honors a local blacksmith in the Edo Period (1603-1868) who forged an iron dildo to break the teeth of a sharp-toothed demon inhabiting a woman’s vagina that had been castrating young men on their wedding nights. A 1m black steel phallus sits in the courtyard of
JAN. 1 CLAUSE: As military service is voluntary, applications for permission to stay abroad for over three months for men up to age 45 must, in principle, be granted A little-noticed clause in sweeping changes to Germany’s military service policy has triggered an uproar after it emerged that the law requires men aged up to 45 to get permission from the armed forces before any significant stay abroad, even in peacetime. The legislation, which went into effect on Jan. 1 aims to bolster the military and demands all 18-year-old men fill out a questionnaire to gauge their suitability to serve in the armed forces, but stops short of conscription. If the “modernized” model fails to pull in enough recruits, parliament will be compelled to discuss the reintroduction of compulsory service, German
Filipino farmers like Romeo Wagayan have been left with little choice but to let their vegetables rot in the field rather than sell them at a loss, as rising oil prices linked to the Iran war drive up the cost of harvesting, labor and transport. “There’s nothing we can do,” said Wagayan, a 57-year old vegetable farmer in the northern Philippine province of Benguet. “If we harvest it, our losses only increase because of labor, transportation and packing costs. We don’t earn anything from it. That’s why we decided not to harvest at all,” he said. Soaring costs caused by the Middle East
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s officially declared wealth is fairly modest: some savings and a jointly owned villa in Budapest. However, voters in what Transparency International deems the EU’s most corrupt country believe otherwise — and they might make Orban pay in a general election this Sunday that could spell an end to his 16-year rule. The wealth amassed by Orban’s inner circle is fueling the increasingly palpable frustration of a population grappling with sluggish growth, high inflation and worsening public services. “The government’s communication machine worked well as long as our economic situation remained relatively good,” said Zoltan Ranschburg, a political analyst