The US Senate early on Tuesday approved US$95 billion in assistance for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan after months of delay, but the legislation still faces formidable obstacles in the House.
The uncertainty over more US aid persists as Ukraine struggles with dwindling supplies, infighting among the country’s leaders and Russian forces on the offensive.
By a vote of 70 to 29 on Tuesday morning following an all-night session, the Senate approved the emergency national security funding package, which includes US$60 billion in war aid for Ukraine alongside funding for Israel, Taiwan and humanitarian aid for Gaza.
Photo: Getty Images via AFP
Republican leaders in the House have demanded that US President Joe Biden first take action to reduce undocumented migration before any Ukraine aid can pass.
Yet a painstakingly negotiated border enforcement deal was dropped from the assistance package following opposition from former US president Donald Trump, the Republican presidential frontrunner, who derided the compromise as a “gift” to Democrats.
US House Speaker Mike Johnson is under threat from ultraconservative members not to allow Ukraine aid to pass without extracting immigration concessions that are anathema to Democrats, such as forcing all asylum seekers to remain in Mexico and building a border wall.
Johnson issued a statement late on Monday rejecting the Senate bill, saying it failed to address the border crisis.
“America deserves better than the Senate’s status quo,” he said.
US House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, a top supporter of Ukraine’s war effort, has said he sees no way Johnson can allow a vote on the Ukraine aid package.
Some Senate Republicans who support Ukraine aid in principle, including Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma, backed an idea floated by Trump over the weekend in a social media post that would make the foreign aid to Ukraine and other countries zero-interest loans with no scheduled repayments.
Mullin told reporters on Monday night that he and other senators discussed the idea with Trump earlier in the day and said it could be part of a path for aid for Ukraine to get through the House.
Opposition from Johnson and Trump allies means they would not be bringing the Senate bill up for a standalone vote in the House. However, there is a way around the speaker, under the House rules.
House Democrats can force a bill to the floor via a rarely used legislative procedure if enough Republicans who support Ukraine join them.
That process takes time and Republicans like Rogers already say they would not join in such a maneuver.
Traditionally, majority party members are reluctant to go against the speaker’s wishes, but urgency to act on Ukraine has increased as its supplies have dwindled.
Mullin doubted whether there would be enough Republican votes for such a discharge petition, citing the timing right before filing deadlines for potential primary challengers in many states.
He also predicted there would be many Democrats who would not sign a discharge petition out of opposition to Israel’s war tactics against Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
Republican Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, a supporter of the package, told reporters that one group of Republicans who could theoretically sign a discharge petition would be those who have announced they are not running for re-election.
The Senate debate over Ukraine funds has been a flashpoint in the conflict within the Republican Party between former US presdient Ronald Reagan-style defense hawks like Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Trump allies who argue for a smaller US presence on the international stage.
McConnell said that Ukraine aid is really an investment in US military capability.
“Security assistance appropriated in support of Ukraine is money invested in America,” McConnell said on the Senate floor. “Every one of our colleagues is capable of understanding that the investments this legislation makes in expanding production capacity — from artillery rounds to rocket motors to submarines — are investments in readiness for long-term competition with China.”
The US defense industry stands to gain about US$35 billion overall from the Senate package.
Fellow Kentucky Republican Rand Paul helped lead the charge against the bill and held up final passage for days.
“It’s a terrible idea to put forward and pass a bill that tries to secure other countries’ borders before we secure our own,” he said on the social media site X.
He told reporters on Monday night that he hoped to delay aid long enough to force a ceasefire in Ukraine.
European officials, who recently approved a more than US$50 billion aid package for Ukraine, have been increasingly concerned by the delays in Washington.
The Pentagon said at the end of December last year that it had run out of money to support Ukraine.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday said it is closely monitoring developments in Venezuela, and would continue to cooperate with democratic allies and work together for regional and global security, stability, and prosperity. The remarks came after the US on Saturday launched a series of airstrikes in Venezuela and kidnapped Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, who was later flown to New York along with his wife. The pair face US charges related to drug trafficking and alleged cooperation with gangs designated as terrorist organizations. Maduro has denied the allegations. The ministry said that it is closely monitoring the political and economic situation
Conflict with Taiwan could leave China with “massive economic disruption, catastrophic military losses, significant social unrest, and devastating sanctions,” a US think tank said in a report released on Monday. The German Marshall Fund released a report titled If China Attacks Taiwan: The Consequences for China of “Minor Conflict” and “Major War” Scenarios. The report details the “massive” economic, military, social and international costs to China in the event of a minor conflict or major war with Taiwan, estimating that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could sustain losses of more than half of its active-duty ground forces, including 100,000 troops. Understanding Chinese
UNRELENTING: China attempted cyberattacks on Taiwan’s critical infrastructure 2.63 million times per day last year, up from 1.23 million in 2023, the NSB said China’s cyberarmy has long engaged in cyberattacks against Taiwan’s critical infrastructure, employing diverse and evolving tactics, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said yesterday, adding that cyberattacks on critical energy infrastructure last year increased 10-fold compared with the previous year. The NSB yesterday released a report titled Analysis on China’s Cyber Threats to Taiwan’s Critical Infrastructure in 2025, outlining the number of cyberattacks, major tactics and hacker groups. Taiwan’s national intelligence community identified a large number of cybersecurity incidents last year, the bureau said in a statement. China’s cyberarmy last year launched an average of 2.63 million intrusion attempts per day targeting Taiwan’s critical
‘SLICING METHOD’: In the event of a blockade, the China Coast Guard would intercept Taiwanese ships while its navy would seek to deter foreign intervention China’s military drills around Taiwan this week signaled potential strategies to cut the nation off from energy supplies and foreign military assistance, a US think tank report said. The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) conducted what it called “Justice Mission 2025” exercises from Monday to Tuesday in five maritime zones and airspace around Taiwan, calling them a warning to “Taiwanese independence” forces. In a report released on Wednesday, the Institute for the Study of War said the exercises effectively simulated blocking shipping routes to major port cities, including Kaohsiung, Keelung and Hualien. Taiwan would be highly vulnerable under such a blockade, because it
RSS