Shanghai Municipal Committee United Front Work Department Director Sha Hailin (沙海林) yesterday said that exchanges between Taipei and Shanghai are conducted under the “one China” principle, which he said was supported by Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) respect for, and understanding of, the so-called “1992 consensus.”
Speaking at the Taipei-Shanghai Forum at the Regent Taipei hotel, Sha, who was supposed to give a 15-minute speech, talked for nearly half an hour, as he expounded on China’s hope of bringing together people on both sides of the Strait.
“I, with the delegation I lead, have come here to cement the friendship between the two cities, promote mutual understanding and deepen the emotional bond between residents of the two cities,” he said.
“[We have come] to write a [song] about brothers, that blood is thicker than water; to celebrate a familial bond across the Taiwan Strait; to cultivate a community of common good and destiny; and to realize the noble goal of reviving the Zhonghua minzu [中華民族, Chinese ethnic group],” he said.
Sha said that over the past eight years, cross-strait ties have benefited greatly from the bedrock of the “1992 consensus,” as shown in the frequent exchanges carried out between the two societies.
All these achievements were made because there had been a “correct” understanding of cross-strait relations and intercity exchanges, he said.
“However, due to a reason everybody knows, something we do not wish to see has transpired in cross-strait affairs,” he said.
“Nevertheless we will remain stalwart in our goal to continue to improve the emotional bond and welfare of people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, come what may,” Sha said. “The people on both sides are one family that share one fate and one future.”
The “1992 consensus,” a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted that he had made up in 2000, refers to a supposed understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese government that both sides of the Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Speaking on the forum’s theme of “a vibrant city,” Sha said that there are five sources of Shanghai’s vibrancy: Trade reform and liberalization, a high-tech sector that focuses on innovation, continuous investment in education, a wide fiber-to-the-home network footprint, an expansive social welfare system that covers long-term healthcare and subsidies on social security premiums, affordable housing and a policy-driven job market.
Sha said about 550 Taiwanese are working in Shanghai’s high-tech sector, high schools and hospitals.
About 2,200 Taiwanese students enroll in Shanghai universities and high schools every year, he said, adding that funding from the Shanghai Municipal Government has helped about 30,000 Taiwanese start businesses there this year.
He said that Shanghai would continue to push policies that would strengthen the bonds and promote the welfare of people on both sides of the Strait.
In his speech, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) reiterated the “2015 new perspective” that he touted at last year’s forum in Shanghai, which is based on “four reciprocal actions” — knowing, understanding, respecting and working with each other — during his concluding remarks, saying that these four actions are gestures of goodwill.
Taipei needs to take the initiative in these four actions and “reach out” if it wants people to collaborate with it, he said.
Taipei is the most liberal city in Taiwan, as Shanghai is in China; therefore, the two cities should learn to bear with each other’s differences, he said.
“Only when we learn to tolerate, thereby appreciate, different views can we build a liberal society and a civilized city,” he said. “While we understand and respect China’s insistence on ‘certain issues,’ we also hope that China will understand and respect Taiwan’s insistence on democratic and liberal values,” he said.
When asked to expound on the “basis” for exchanges between the two cities during a question-and-answer session, Sha told reporters that in addition to the “1992 consensus,” the Taipei City Government’s creation of a Mainland Affairs Division, which deals with issues between Taipei and Shanghai, shows that Taipei has the “right concept” in approaching intercity exchanges.
Asked to comment on Sha’s insistence on the “one China” principle, Ko said that he understands and respects what Sha must say given his position.
“He [Sha] would get in trouble if he said something wrong,” Ko said.
Ko evaded a question on whether Sha’s interpretation of the title of the Taipei’s Mainland Affairs Division meant that he had belittled the city.
Asked whether Sha really understood Taiwan’s democratic and liberal values, Ko said: “I think so, why else would he agree to come?”
MISINFORMATION: The generated content tends to adopt China’s official stance, such as ‘Taiwan is currently governed by the Chinese central government,’ the NSB said Five China-developed artificial intelligence (AI) language models exhibit cybersecurity risks and content biases, an inspection conducted by the National Security Bureau (NSB) showed. The five AI tools are: DeepSeek, Doubao (豆包), Yiyan (文心一言), Tongyi (通義千問) and Yuanbao (騰訊元寶), the bureau said, advising people to remain vigilant to protect personal data privacy and corporate business secrets. The NSB said it, in accordance with the National Intelligence Services Act (國家情報工作法), has reviewed international cybersecurity reports and intelligence, and coordinated with the Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau and the National Police Agency’s Criminal Investigation Bureau to conduct an inspection of China-made AI language
LIMITS: While China increases military pressure on Taiwan and expands its use of cognitive warfare, it is unwilling to target tech supply chains, the report said US and Taiwan military officials have warned that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could implement a blockade within “a matter of hours” and need only “minimal conversion time” prior to an attack on Taiwan, a report released on Tuesday by the US Senate’s China Economic and Security Review Commission said. “While there is no indication that China is planning an imminent attack, the United States and its allies and partners can no longer assume that a Taiwan contingency is a distant possibility for which they would have ample time to prepare,” it said. The commission made the comments in its annual
CHECKING BOUNDARIES: China wants to disrupt solidarity among democracies and test their red lines, but it is instead pushing nations to become more united, an expert said The US Department of State on Friday expressed deep concern over a Chinese public security agency’s investigation into Legislator Puma Shen (沈伯洋) for “secession.” “China’s actions threaten free speech and erode norms that have underpinned the cross-strait ‘status quo’ for decades,” a US Department of State spokesperson said. The Chongqing Municipal Public Security Bureau late last month listed Shen as “wanted” and launched an investigation into alleged “secession-related” criminal activities, including his founding of the Kuma Academy, a civil defense organization that prepares people for an invasion by China. The spokesperson said that the US was “deeply concerned” about the bureau investigating Shen
‘TROUBLEMAKER’: Most countries believe that it is China — rather than Taiwan — that is undermining regional peace and stability with its coercive tactics, the president said China should restrain itself and refrain from being a troublemaker that sabotages peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region, President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks after China Coast Guard vessels sailed into disputed waters off the Senkaku Islands — known as the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) in Taiwan — following a remark Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made regarding Taiwan. Takaichi during a parliamentary session on Nov. 7 said that a “Taiwan contingency” involving a Chinese naval blockade could qualify as a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan, and trigger Tokyo’s deployment of its military for defense. Asked about the escalating tensions