Since ChatGPT stunned the world three years ago with the powers of generative AI, countries have grappled with how to govern the rapidly developing technology.
As Vietnam’s artificial intelligence law goes into effect on Sunday, here is a look at regulation efforts around the globe:
EU: FIRST MOVE
Photo: AFP
The European Union is considered a trailblazer, having adopted in 2024 what it calls “the world’s first comprehensive AI law” penalized with heavy fines.
The law takes a risk-based approach: if a system is high-risk, a company will have a stricter set of obligations to fulfill before being authorized in the EU.
These landmark rules have faced pushback from the US under President Donald Trump, but also from businesses and governments at home that complain they could hamper growth.
Photo: AFP
The EU bowed to pressure last year and proposed changes including partially delaying the law’s application in a move it says will help European companies compete globally.
The law will now be fully applicable next year, but the EU already allows regulators to ban systems deemed to pose unacceptable risks.
That could include “social scoring” systems that lead to discrimination by classifying individuals or groups based on social behavior or personal traits.
US: LAND OF THE FREE
The US, home to ChatGPT maker OpenAI, chip titan Nvidia and tech giants like Google, is not keen on enacting new rules.
Vice President JD Vance has warned against “excessive regulation” that “could kill a transformative sector.”
And at a major AI summit in New Delhi last month, the US delegation head said the country “totally” rejects global governance of AI.
Some states have taken matters into their own hands, although the Washington is trying to find ways to stop this from happening.
California enacted a first-of-its-kind law in October requiring AI chatbot operators to implement safeguards such as referring people who express thoughts on suicide to crisis services.
ASIA: NEW LAWS
A wide-ranging law took full effect in South Korea in January, requiring companies to tell users when products use generative AI.
It also says they must clearly label content, including deepfakes, that cannot readily be differentiated from reality.
Places like Taiwan and Japan are taking a lighter touch on AI regulation, shying away from penalties in favor of voluntary guidelines promoting innovation.
China — racing to challenge US dominance in the technology — has its own complex and evolving set of guardrails.
“What stands out about China is how regulated it is, despite the innovation happening,” said Seth Hays, author of the Asia AI Policy Monitor newsletter.
“For example, firms need to register their models with the government, and there are stricter content moderation, labeling and user verification requirements not seen elsewhere.”
GLOBAL DEBATE
Many other countries, from Brazil to the United Arab Emirates, are implementing AI frameworks that can roughly be divided into risk-based rules like the EU’s, or pro-innovation guidelines.
At the New Delhi summit, 91 countries and organizations called for “secure, trustworthy and robust” AI.
But their declaration, signed by the US and China, was criticized by AI safety campaigners for being too generic to protect the public.
A 40-member UN expert panel has also been established to work towards “science-led governance” of the technology, the global body’s chief Antonio Guterres has said.
Jason Han says that the e-arrival card spat between South Korea and Taiwan shows that Seoul is signaling adherence to its “one-China” policy, while Taiwan’s response reflects a reciprocal approach. “Attempts to alter the diplomatic status quo often lead to tit-for-tat responses,” the analyst on international affairs tells the Taipei Times, adding that Taiwan may become more cautious in its dealings with South Korea going forward. Taipei has called on Seoul to correct its electronic entry system, which currently lists Taiwan as “China (Taiwan),” warning that reciprocal measures may follow if the wording is not changed before March 31. As of yesterday,
The Portuguese never established a presence on Taiwan, but they must have traded with the indigenous people because later traders reported that the locals referred to parts of deer using Portuguese words. What goods might the Portuguese have offered their indigenous trade partners? Among them must have been slaves, for the Portuguese dealt slaves across Asia. Though we often speak of “Portuguese” ships, imagining them as picturesque vessels manned by pointy-bearded Iberians, in Asia Portuguese shipping between local destinations was crewed by Asian seamen, with a handful of white or Eurasian officers. “Even the great carracks of 1,000-2,000 tons which plied
It’s only half the size of its more famous counterpart in Taipei, but the Botanical Garden of the National Museum of Nature Science (NMNS, 國立自然科學博物館植物園) is surely one of urban Taiwan’s most inviting green spaces. Covering 4.5 hectares immediately northeast of the government-run museum in Taichung’s North District (北區), the garden features more than 700 plant species, many of which are labeled in Chinese but not in English. Since its establishment in 1999, the site’s managers have done their best to replicate a number of native ecosystems, dividing the site into eight areas. The name of the Coral Atoll Zone might
Nuclear power is getting a second look in Southeast Asia as countries prepare to meet surging energy demand as they vie for artificial intelligence-focused data centers. Several Southeast Asian nations are reviving mothballed nuclear plans and setting ambitious targets and nearly half of the region could, if they pursue those goals, have nuclear energy in the 2030s. Even countries without current plans have signaled their interest. Southeast Asia has never produced a single watt of nuclear energy, despite long-held atomic ambitions. But that may soon change as pressure mounts to reduce emissions that contribute to climate change, while meeting growing power needs. The
RSS