On Facebook a friend posted a dashcam video of a vehicle driving through the ash-colored wasteland of what was once Taroko Gorge. A crane appears in the video, and suddenly it becomes clear: the video is in color, not black and white.
The magnitude 7.2 earthquake’s destruction on April 3 around and above Taroko and its reverberations across an area heavily dependent on tourism have largely vanished from the international press discussions as the news cycle moves on, but local residents still live with its consequences every day. For example, with the damage to the road corridors between Yilan and Hualien, the traveling public has shifted to rail as its preferred mode of transport. Both travelers and administrators have to make constant adjustments to this new reality, lengthening travel times and raising costs. The road damage has also forced all trucked in supplies to travel around the southern end of the island of Taiwan and up Highway 11.
LOST ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
Photo: Wang Chun-chi, Taipei Times
The quake has also pushed other issues out of the news. It came on the heels of an abnormally cool March, the pollination season for southern Hualien’s mango crop, among others. In Yuli (玉里) and Jhuosi (卓溪) townships in some areas production fell 30 percent and local farmers are applying for assistance. The local governments have been organizing exhibitions of Hualien agricultural products elsewhere in Taiwan to help local farmers, hard hit by the quake.
Long-term shifts are driving rising costs of living on the coast. As people move out of the cities in search of less pressured environments, house prices are rising. Places to rent are difficult to find. Laborers for routine tasks like laying cement and putting in electric lights are more expensive, since many of the best workers, according to the locals, have moved over to the other coast where the money is better. The quake has put even more pressure on local workers.
Ease of access has meant that images coming out of the quake-stricken areas were largely of the two dramatically affected buildings in Hualien city, and a few videos of roads in Taroko. Images of the destruction of the trails in and above the park, along with local places to stay and associated infrastructure, are hard to find even in local papers.
Photo courtesy of the Hualien County Government
According to reports, numerous tourist sites were destroyed. For example, large rocks fell on the huts at Buluowan (布洛灣山月村) and destroyed its water supply. The current operator was forced to terminate its contract because the site could no longer be operated. Many popular trails were knocked out, as a glance at Google maps will show.
All that economic activity is now lost. Many of the communities suffering the most are indigenous communities.
In early April, a few days after the quake, the Hualien Tourism Council announced that Hualien would lose NT$5.3 billion. The head of the organization said they expected hotel bookings to fall by 90 percent. The hit was worse than normal, because the quake occurred on the four-day Tomb Sweeping Holiday.
Photo courtesy of the Directorate General of Highways
The economic effect is actually far greater and more pervasive than suggested by the Hualien Tourism Council. The $5.3 billion figure was calculated by multiplying tourist spending in Hualien per hotel-room day, NT$5,700, by the 17,000 hotel rooms in the county. Day trips and tours from Taipei to Taroko are also gone. As cash flows dry up to local restaurants and service outlets, locals will able spending less money.
Hualien remains a major tourist destination. Though it is easy to think that the problems will be limited to Taroko, in reality, with access substantially more difficult, the hit will be felt across the county and further south. A friend who works closely with indigenous communities in developing indigenous tourism just returned from Taitung, where she told me tourism has taken a substantial blow.
The trucks on Highway 11 are already reducing the bike tour groups, according to friends of mine in the area. There will also be secondary effects like a general downturn in people taking mountain vacations and trips to Hualien out of fear of quakes. That will recover in time.
On May 2 the cabinet cobbled together a budget from various central and local government funds for repairs and rebuilding totaling NT$28.55 billion. The budget also supports installation of earthquake sensors and safety equipment at Chongde and Heren stations in Hualien (incredibly, they did not have them before this quake despite frequent quakes in the area).
HEAD TO HUALIEN
This will help locals, but they need us to get out to the east coast and spend. If rail tickets are hard to get, remember that Taitung airport is an hour by plane from Taipei’s Songshan Airport. The quake last month was the latest in a long string of problems that have pounded the tourism industry in Hualien, dating back to the 2018 quake, which was followed by the pandemic.
Meanwhile, the quake’s effect on communications between Hualien and points north is bound to be harnessed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in its quest to put in a highway through the rift valley, another from the east coast to the west coast, and an HSR line down the east coast and around the island.
I have argued elsewhere that a key purpose of KMT-supported large project spending is reducing funding available for defense (“Taiwan’s construction-industrial money pit”, April 8, 2024). But the quake’s highlighting of communication issues should suggest to defense planners — and potential foes — that east coast communications could be easily interdicted in a conflict, especially as new and more capable drones come online (recall that one of the nation’s most important airbases is in Hualien, south of that bottleneck).
Instead of spending money on highways that will blight the Rift Valley and the mountains and be damaged or blocked in major quakes, the government could use the quake to promote hardening and expansion of the ports on the east coast — which Taiwan will need if supplies are to schlepped up from Philippines in a conflict and some judicious hardening and perhaps expansion of the Yilan-Hualien road connections.
In the meantime, go there and spend. The people need it.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
Oct. 27 to Nov. 2 Over a breakfast of soymilk and fried dough costing less than NT$400, seven officials and engineers agreed on a NT$400 million plan — unaware that it would mark the beginning of Taiwan’s semiconductor empire. It was a cold February morning in 1974. Gathered at the unassuming shop were Economics minister Sun Yun-hsuan (孫運璿), director-general of Transportation and Communications Kao Yu-shu (高玉樹), Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) president Wang Chao-chen (王兆振), Telecommunications Laboratories director Kang Pao-huang (康寶煌), Executive Yuan secretary-general Fei Hua (費驊), director-general of Telecommunications Fang Hsien-chi (方賢齊) and Radio Corporation of America (RCA) Laboratories director Pan
The consensus on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair race is that Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) ran a populist, ideological back-to-basics campaign and soundly defeated former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), the candidate backed by the big institutional players. Cheng tapped into a wave of popular enthusiasm within the KMT, while the institutional players’ get-out-the-vote abilities fell flat, suggesting their power has weakened significantly. Yet, a closer look at the race paints a more complicated picture, raising questions about some analysts’ conclusions, including my own. TURNOUT Here is a surprising statistic: Turnout was 130,678, or 39.46 percent of the 331,145 eligible party
The classic warmth of a good old-fashioned izakaya beckons you in, all cozy nooks and dark wood finishes, as tables order a third round and waiters sling tapas-sized bites and assorted — sometimes unidentifiable — skewered meats. But there’s a romantic hush about this Ximending (西門町) hotspot, with cocktails savored, plating elegant and never rushed and daters and diners lit by candlelight and chandelier. Each chair is mismatched and the assorted tables appear to be the fanciest picks from a nearby flea market. A naked sewing mannequin stands in a dimly lit corner, adorned with antique mirrors and draped foliage
President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”