Murumuru spends his weekends toiling on building sites in Japan in the sticky heat of summer to supplement the income from his other job at a bakery. A certified IT specialist, he arrived in Tokyo from Sri Lanka a year ago, hoping to take advantage of job opportunities that have opened up as part of Japan’s efforts to tackle its population crisis and encourage more immigration.
But Murumuru, a nickname given to him by his Japanese colleagues, has found it hard. Despite staff shortages, both he and his wife, a qualified physiotherapist, have found the language barrier an obstacle.
“All of the hospitals ask for N1, as do many IT jobs,” he explains, referring to the highest-level Japanese test for foreigners, requiring the ability to read around 2,000 kanji characters.
Photo: Bloomberg
Despite initial plans to stay for five years, the couple are considering a move elsewhere, perhaps to the UK. They have relatives there and believe his wife could find work in the National Health Service.
With the population expected to decline dramatically in the coming decades — leaving a gaping hole in the workforce — Japan is quietly easing restrictions and accepting record numbers of migrants, mostly from Asian countries such as Vietnam, China, Indonesia and the Philippines. Data released in July showed a record population fall of nearly 800,000 but it also revealed a jump in overseas-born residents, to an all-time high of around 3 million, almost 50 percent up on a decade ago.
The shift provides a welcome boost to the size of its working-age population but requires authorities to negotiate Japan’s complex relationship with “outside people.” Meanwhile, new arrivals often have to navigate rigorous language requirements for jobs that pay less than in comparable countries.
Photo: Bloomberg
ONCE PAID TO LEAVE
Bringing skilled workers from overseas is requiring a significant shift in a nation that not so long ago treated foreign labor as something akin to a necessary, if temporary, nuisance.
The treatment of Japanese-Brazilians who came in the 1990s to work in the factories of Japan is a case in point. The importance placed on bloodlines meant the Brazilian descendants of Japanese emigrants were given priority over other foreign workers in being offered visas.
However, it became clear that most of the new arrivals didn’t speak Japanese and were culturally Brazilian. When the 2008 global financial crisis forced firms to lay off workers, the Japanese government offered them US$3,000 each to go home and not come back.
Japan’s ethnic Korean population has a much longer history, and one that speaks to the challenges in welcoming migration. During the occupation of the Korean Peninsula from 1910 to 1945, thousands of Koreans were forced to work in Japan.
More than 400,000 of their descendants remain, given special residence status but neither Japanese nationality nor the right to vote. Kwang Park, a Tokyo-born descendant, says his identity feels “neutral,” somewhere in-between the two nationalities.
Park remembers encountering discrimination in his early years at school, but said that things had changed by the time his youngest brother went to school seven years later.
“Now I work at a global company, so of course there are foreigners and my background isn’t an issue. I don’t know if the situation would be different were I at a Japanese firm,” he says.
Despite the demographic challenges, Japan has remained reluctant to accept refugees and the number of applicants it grants asylum to annually rarely exceeds double digits. The warm welcome rolled out to around 2,500 Ukrainians since the war began appears at first glance to be a striking exception to decades of policy.
Mariko Ukiyo is a counsellor who runs the Shibuya Himawari center in Tokyo providing support for around 1,500 Ukrainian refugees fleeing the war.
“There is a lot of goodwill towards Ukrainian evacuees because people feel sympathy for their situation and understand their country has been invaded by Russia,” she says.
However, Ukiyo acknowledges that their designation as evacuees, and the understanding that they will return to Ukraine after hostilities end, is a major factor in the positive treatment.
WILL IT BE ENOUGH?
Easing immigration restrictions, such as visa exemptions and expanding the definition of a skilled worker, is a key part of Japan’s efforts to, as prime minister Fumio Kishida put it, “continue to function as a society” but one question remains: will Japan be able to attract enough people?
Park believes it will be hard for Japan to lure large numbers of skilled workers due to language difficulties, dealing with the complexities of Japanese culture and uncompetitive wages in many sectors.
Naohiro Yashiro, dean at the faculty of global business at Showa Women’s University in Tokyo, agrees, saying he believes Japan needs to realize it is “in competition with other countries for the best workers,” and that “the government should persuade the public that accepting immigrants is good for Japan.”
For these reasons, Yashiro dismisses as “nonsense” the projections from the National Institute of Population and Social Security Research that by 2070 more than 10 percent of the total population of Japan, or 9.4 million, will be from overseas (the total population is forecast to fall to 87 million at that point, from the current 125 million).
Yashiro noted that while the government had expanded the definition of skilled immigrant workers, which previously applied mainly to graduates, to include skilled blue-collar workers, the Japanese language requirement had been raised, “a kind of restriction.”
One of the major benefits of more immigration is an increase in competition in the labor market, says Yashiro. With unemployment hovering around 2.5 percent and vacancies often exceeding candidates, the job market is not exactly cut-throat, he says, something that also reduces the probability of resentment against newly arrived workers.
But amid all the questions and difficulties, there are positive signs of a shift.
Park has never seriously considered giving up his Korean passport, but his daughter will have to choose her nationality once she reaches 20, assuming the present laws remain. “We live here and speak Japanese, so I’m fine if she chooses Japan,” he says.
Despite the challenges, Murumuru says there is plenty to like about his current home in Tokyo.
“I really like Japan. I feel no racism from 99 percent of people here,” he says, adding, “People respect each other, whether they do white-collar or blue-collar jobs.”
The Nuremberg trials have inspired filmmakers before, from Stanley Kramer’s 1961 drama to the 2000 television miniseries with Alec Baldwin and Brian Cox. But for the latest take, Nuremberg, writer-director James Vanderbilt focuses on a lesser-known figure: The US Army psychiatrist Douglas Kelley, who after the war was assigned to supervise and evaluate captured Nazi leaders to ensure they were fit for trial (and also keep them alive). But his is a name that had been largely forgotten: He wasn’t even a character in the miniseries. Kelley, portrayed in the film by Rami Malek, was an ambitious sort who saw in
Last week gave us the droll little comedy of People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) consul general in Osaka posting a threat on X in response to Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi saying to the Diet that a Chinese attack on Taiwan may be an “existential threat” to Japan. That would allow Japanese Self Defence Forces to respond militarily. The PRC representative then said that if a “filthy neck sticks itself in uninvited, we will cut it off without a moment’s hesitation. Are you prepared for that?” This was widely, and probably deliberately, construed as a threat to behead Takaichi, though it
Among the Nazis who were prosecuted during the Nuremberg trials in 1945 and 1946 was Hitler’s second-in-command, Hermann Goring. Less widely known, though, is the involvement of the US psychiatrist Douglas Kelley, who spent more than 80 hours interviewing and assessing Goring and 21 other Nazi officials prior to the trials. As described in Jack El-Hai’s 2013 book The Nazi and the Psychiatrist, Kelley was charmed by Goring but also haunted by his own conclusion that the Nazis’ atrocities were not specific to that time and place or to those people: they could in fact happen anywhere. He was ultimately
Nov. 17 to Nov. 23 When Kanori Ino surveyed Taipei’s Indigenous settlements in 1896, he found a culture that was fading. Although there was still a “clear line of distinction” between the Ketagalan people and the neighboring Han settlers that had been arriving over the previous 200 years, the former had largely adopted the customs and language of the latter. “Fortunately, some elders still remember their past customs and language. But if we do not hurry and record them now, future researchers will have nothing left but to weep amid the ruins of Indigenous settlements,” he wrote in the Journal of
RSS