Forests are a crucial component of global ecology. They cover about one third of the Earth’s land surface, and play key roles in mitigating climate change, maintaining biodiversity and protecting soil and water resources.
Some forests perform these functions more effectively than others. Man-made woodlands dominated by a single type of tree can’t nurture nearly so many animal, bird and insect species as old-growth tropical rainforest. The amount of carbon stored in wood, leaves and soil varies greatly from one place to another. The “integrity” of a forest — the degree to which its ecosystems have escaped human modification — is a huge influence on how much good it does the planet.
To better quantify and map the state of the world’s forests, an international team of experts last year devised the Forest Landscape Integrity Index (FLII). In a paper published on Dec. 8 last year in Nature Communications, they described the FLII as “a globally consistent, continuous index of forest condition as determined by the degree of anthropogenic modification.”
Photo: Steven Crook
The FLII assessed forests (which it defines as woody vegetation taller than 5m) by weighing observed human pressures (roads and other infrastructure obvious from satellite images), inferred human pressures (such as collection of forest materials) and changes in forest connectivity (habitat fragmentation is a serious problem for many animal and bird species).
According to the FLII, only four tenths of the world’s forests display high landscape-level integrity. The paper’s authors argue that: “Ambitious policies that prioritize the retention of forest integrity, especially in the most intact areas, are now urgently needed alongside current efforts aimed at halting deforestation and restoring the integrity of forests globally.”
On the FLII Web site (www.forestintegrity.com), it’s possible to zoom in on any point on Earth. Wooded land is colored brown (indicating low landscape integrity), light green (medium integrity) or dark green (high integrity). Each pixel represents a 300m x 300m plot.
Photo courtesy of Chiang Jyh-min
Mean forest integrity indices have been calculated for 172 countries and territories. Taiwan’s FLII of 6.38 is lower than that of the US (6.65) or China (7.14), but higher than that of South Korea (6.02), Thailand (exactly 6) and Japan (5.8).
Taiwan isn’t unusual in having just a small area of high-integrity woodland (about 5.9 percent of all forest — less than the combined land area of Taroko (太魯閣) and Shei-Pa (雪霸) national parks) but a high proportion of medium-integrity forest.
The index doesn’t take into consideration areas of forest which, as the human population grew and spread, disappeared altogether.
Photo courtesy of Chiang Jyh-min
Looking at the FLII map for Taiwan, there’s an obvious correlation between altitude and forest integrity. Almost all the green pixels are located within or very close to the mountain ranges that dominate the interior and the east coast. Foothill areas are invariably brown. There’s hardly any forest on the flatlands.
Curious to know if the FLII’s “one size fits all” approach presents an accurate picture of the country’s wooded areas, the Taipei Times reached out to Chiang Jyh-min (江智民), a professor in the Department of Life Science at Tunghai University.
After examining how the FLII was calculated, Chiang says: “I think the method is quite comprehensive and appropriate for forests around the globe, including Taiwan. I’ve also checked their results Web page, and zoomed in on different areas of Taiwan and found it generally realistic.”
Photo: Steven Crook
However, he expresses doubts about the high-integrity rating given to some high-altitude agricultural areas, such as those between Hehuanshan (合歡山) and Yilan accessed by Provincial Highway 7A (台7甲) and those near Lishan (梨山) close to Provincial Highway 8 (台8).
“It’s hard to believe that these areas have higher FLII values than rural areas such as Taiping (太平) in Taichung or Baguashan (八卦山) in Changhua,” he says.
“Proper functioning of an ecosystem requires the stable movement of energy and matter throughout different components of the ecosystem, thus sustaining the stability and diversity of microhabitats. Functions crucial to human welfare, which we call ‘ecosystem services,’ include carbon sequestration, erosion control, provision of raw materials, maintenance of climate stability, water supplies and so on,” says Chiang, who’s also director of Tunghai University’s Center for Ecology and Environment.
Photo: Steven Crook
Referring to an area he knows well, Chiang says that people living near Lienhuachih Research Center (蓮華池研究中心) and its experimental forest in Nantou County depend on the natural broadleaf and plantation forest for a stable water supply.
“Even during the sustained drought earlier this year, farmers there were able to use stream water for irrigation,” he says.
The research center is affiliated with the Council of Agriculture’s Taiwan Forestry Research Institute.
Photo: Steven Crook
In recent years, Lienhuachih residents have had another reason to care about the health of nearby woodlands. The area’s forests are important wildlife habitats, and the growth of ecotourism in the area “is deeply dependent on forest integrity and the quality of the landscape,” says Chiang.
Around the world, human activities range from eco-friendly practices to atrociously destructive behavior.
“Take tea plantations, for example,” says Chiang. “Organic farming and regular farming practices have very different environmental impacts on the integrity of the nearby forests. I don’t think the FLII takes the difference into account.”
Overall, Taiwan’s government has done “a very good job” protecting the integrity of the country’s forests, Chiang says. He highlights the longstanding ban on logging natural forests and the large parcels of land protected by national parks as successful policies.
However, he urges the authorities to pay more attention to lands between protected areas and human settlements, as that’s where there’s partial cultivation and other human impacts.
Chiang supports the Forestry Bureau’s Green Network Establishment Project as an attempt to “reconnect fragmented habitats to larger protected areas, through streams and green corridors, to sustain the ecosystem functions and the biodiversity of these ‘forgotten areas’” — but points out that private land ownership complicates this effort.
He hopes the government can steer the agricultural sector toward environmentally-friendly practices such as organic farming. He also approves of government efforts to regulate campgrounds.
Chiang’s team was awarded a four-year grant by the Ministry of Science and Technology to investigate the ecosystem services of the Lienhuachih area and how they impact local businesses.
His team is investigating: the extent of land-use change in recent years as camping has grown in popularity; how local biodiversity depends on the forest’s ecosystem functionings; and how climate change can potentially impact ecosystem functioning and, consequently, local businesses. In addition, they’re trying to determine how much local people know about the ecosystem services they depend on, and what activities can be implemented to promote local awareness of forest integrity.
Lienhuachih residents are already showing some understanding of and interest in preserving the natural environment.
Each year, between late April and early May, tens of thousands tourists visit the area to see fireflies. Recognizing the value of these insects to the local economy, residents have established a committee to protect water quality in streams that are crucially important to maintaining the health of firefly habitats.
That’s a start.
Steven Crook, the author or co-author of four books about Taiwan, has been following environmental issues since he arrived in the country in 1991. He drives a hybrid and carries his own chopsticks. The views expressed here are his own.
Taiwan’s English education system is being pulled apart by three opposing forces. Bilingual Nation 2030 pulls students toward English and global communication. Artificial Intelligence (AI) readiness pulls them toward digital judgment, verification and AI-mediated work. But Taiwan’s old exam culture pulls them back toward memorization, grammar drills, timed reading and correct answers. If the education system keeps using old exams to define success, it risks producing graduates who are neither genuinely bilingual nor genuinely AI-ready, but trained for tasks machines can already perform. The first force is Bilingual Nation 2030. Launched in 2018, the policy aimed to “help Taiwan’s workforce connect
It seems every few days one bumps into one of those “real man” comments in which Taiwan is urged to “face reality” or similar, and “make a deal,” with the speaker implying that soon it will be too late. “Deal” advocates always present themselves as having a superior grip on reality, and the manly ability to make the “hard choice.” Their testosterone-laden language often echoes that of Taiwan sellout advocates. Note that such commentary always specifies a process (“make a deal, work with, make progress”), never the end state of what occupation by a violent authoritarian colonialist state will entail. In
There are shadowy cabals plotting to sell out Taiwan to be annexed by China, by invasion if necessary. Fortunately, they are buffoons. In 2019, former Bamboo Union gangster and founder of the China Unification Promotion Party (CUPP), Chang An-le (張安樂, colorfully known as “White Wolf”), led a protest at the Legislative Yuan against comments made by then-premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) that in the event of an attack by China, he would never surrender, but would protect the nation by fighting to the end, even if he only had a broom. Chang had party members bring a wooden casket that they
June 1 to June 7 "If all Taiwanese were as afraid of dying as you, then what would happen?” Physician Shih Chiang-nan (施江南) reportedly said this to his wife Chen Chiao-tung (陳焦桐) after she urged him to stop intervening on behalf of Taiwanese soldiers stranded overseas after serving in the Japanese Army during World War II. Shih had clashed with high-ranking officials over the issue, engaged in several heated arguments with Taiwan governor-general Chen Yi (陳儀) and allegedly shouted at general Ko Yuan-fen (柯遠芬), chief of staff of the Taiwan Garrison Command, over