Art is a nebulous subject and few people share the same definition. But can a documentary be art? It may not be intended as such, but given its ability to comment on contemporary society as well as provide an aesthetic quality, then why not?
Under the theme "Do you believe in reality?" the 2004 Taipei Biennial places heavy emphasis on the value of documentary filmmaking as a medium for artists to link reality with art. Showcasing 16 documentaries from Taiwan in addition to several international works, this year's biennial highlights several artists for whom film is a monumental part of their work.
PHOTO COURTESY OF TFAM
"The borders of what define art have disappeared," said Chen Chieh-jen (陳界仁), one of the Taiwanese artists participating this year. "They [documentary filmmakers] are concerned with reality. They take their material from things that happen in everyday life and use filmmaking as a method to produce art," he said.
Chen's 30-minute documentary, Factory, which deals with textile factory workers who lost their jobs during the downturn in the Taiwan economy in the 1980s, is being screened at this year's biennial. With the aid of Chen, Barbara Vanderlinden, one of the event's curators, selected 16 Taiwanese documentaries to run in a film festival.
Chen also collaborated with Taiwanese architect Chang Yun-he (張永和) on the construction of a large installation piece, which will screen the films in the foyer of the museum throughout the duration of the biennial. Rather than use one large screen, Chang created several areas to show all the films simultaneously.
The way in which they are played takes into consideration the theme of each film. For instance, three documentaries Shattered Dreams, A Glimpse of My Ambition and Marriage on the Borders, which focus on the exploitation of foreign laborers and brides in Taiwan, will be played on television sets at ground level. Viewers must kneel to watch the films reflecting the inferior position that minorities are often subjected to.
Likewise, Taipei, Looking Up? which documents a female elevator operator in the world's tallest building, Taipei 101, is played on a screen at a high angle so that viewers must look up to watch the film.
Provocative political themes such as the persecution of leftwingers after the Chinese Nationalist Party retreated to Taiwan is dealt with in several of the films, as are topics of national identity, Aboriginal rights and sex and gender issues.
Pratchaya Phinthong takes the documentaries on the road in his Mobile Cinema. The young Thai artist uses his battery-operated vehicle to take the 16 Taiwanese documentaries to five open-air cinema locations in the vicinity of the museum. Phinthong's car is not only a vehicle by which to remove art from the institution, he said, but also a means to invade urban spaces and engage with the public.
Not included in the documentary festival but exhibiting in the biennial are works from renowned international artists working with the medium of film, such as Apichatpong Weersethakul, the Thai director and winner of the Jury Prize at this year's Cannes Film Festival, in addition to British artist Jeremy Deller, winner of the 2004 Turner prize.
The art of communication through documentary has mainstreamed with recent successful ventures such as Michael Moore's Farenheit 9/11 and Morgan Spurlock's Super Size Me. The Taipei biennial's selection of short documentary films and video installations may not share the box offices sales of those above, but they are equally informative and much more artistic.
Given the disturbing content of an average news program, its natural for the public to construct barriers in order to protect themselves from the reality they watch on their television sets. Presenting these documentaries in the context of an art exhibition has significantly more impact on the audience, who may otherwise be desensitized to such subject matter.
The documentary film festival will run over three days and take place each weekend during the duration the biennial. The first screening runs Oct. 29 to Oct. 31 and will be held in the museum's auditorium. For a complete listing of the films and their scheduled times check the official biennial Web site at http://www.taipeibiennial.org.
It is barely 10am and the queue outside Onigiri Bongo already stretches around the block. Some of the 30 or so early-bird diners sit on stools, sipping green tea and poring over laminated menus. Further back it is standing-room only. “It’s always like this,” says Yumiko Ukon, who has run this modest rice ball shop and restaurant in the Otsuka neighbourhood of Tokyo for almost half a century. “But we never run out of rice,” she adds, seated in her office near a wall clock in the shape of a rice ball with a bite taken out. Bongo, opened in 1960 by
Common sense is not that common: a recent study from the University of Pennsylvania concludes the concept is “somewhat illusory.” Researchers collected statements from various sources that had been described as “common sense” and put them to test subjects. The mixed bag of results suggested there was “little evidence that more than a small fraction of beliefs is common to more than a small fraction of people.” It’s no surprise that there are few universally shared notions of what stands to reason. People took a horse worming drug to cure COVID! They think low-traffic neighborhoods are a communist plot and call
The sprawling port city of Kaohsiung seldom wins plaudits for its beauty or architectural history. That said, like any other metropolis of its size, it does have a number of strange or striking buildings. This article describes a few such curiosities, all but one of which I stumbled across by accident. BOMBPROOF HANGARS Just north of Kaohsiung International Airport, hidden among houses and small apartment buildings that look as though they were built between 15 and 30 years ago, are two mysterious bunker-like structures that date from the airport’s establishment as a Japanese base during World War II. Each is just about
Over the years, whole libraries of pro-People’s Republic of China (PRC) texts have been issued by commentators on “the Taiwan problem,” or the PRC’s desire to annex Taiwan. These documents have a number of features in common. They isolate Taiwan from other areas and issues of PRC expansion. They blame Taiwan’s rhetoric or behavior for PRC actions, particularly pro-Taiwan leadership and behavior. They present the brutal authoritarian state across the Taiwan Strait as conciliatory and rational. Even their historical frames are PRC propaganda. All of this, and more, colors the latest “analysis” and recommendations from the International Crisis Group, “The Widening