Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) took the stage at a protest rally on Sunday in front of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei in support of former TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who has been sentenced to 17 years in jail for corruption and embezzlement.
Huang told the crowd that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) had sent a message of support the previous day, saying she would be traveling from the south to Taipei: If the protest continued into the evening, she had said, she would show up. The rally was due to end at 4:30pm. About 20 of the 52 KMT legislators were in attendance. Huang thanked Cheng for her support, as well as that of his “friends in the KMT.”
Cheng’s absence reflects Huang’s complicated relationship with his “friends in the KMT.” Her physical distance was a metaphor for the strategic distance the KMT would like to maintain: The TPP, and Huang himself, perform a useful role at the moment, but lines need to be drawn.
Another “friend from the KMT” present at the rally was former KMT vice presidential candidate Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康). Jaw spoke, but was very clear about where his lines were drawn, and this was likely a reflection of consensus within the party. He made his speech about judicial reform, which he said was much needed in the light of Ko’s sentencing, coming as it did at the end of an investigation that he said lacked due process, evidential rigor or proportionality. By keeping it to judicial reform and what he portrayed as the failings of the government, he set the stage for a political narrative the KMT could exploit. He was very specific that his presence there was not to be interpreted as implying Ko was innocent.
The KMT needs the TPP to maintain its effective legislative majority until 2028, and it needs it to be “on board,” functioning and undistracted. The KMT would keep its distance, and its support would come with lines drawn. The TPP cannot rely on this support if the KMT secures a legislative majority by itself.
Huang absolutely needs the KMT. His decision to partner with the bigger party in his bid for New Taipei City mayor comes from the extreme unlikelihood that he would defeat the KMT candidate. A KMT-TPP pairing arguably makes strategic sense: If Huang can get his foot in the door as deputy mayor, he could be on track for full mayorship in a future race and from then, potentially, all the way to a presidential race. It is a path that worked for New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), who was deputy mayor under former mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫) and ran for president in 2024. However, the KMT has no strategic reason to support Huang in the long term. It would try to outmaneuver him, just as he is trying to outmaneuver the KMT.
Huang lacks the political bedrock of a substantial record in office or political resources. He is known for three things: ideological fickleness, obsessive loyalty to Ko and uncontrolled, performative politics. The latter two were on show when he took the stage on Sunday.
Protesting Ko’s innocence, Huang invoked the thunder, but failed to bring on the rain: His face turned red, but he did not shed any tears. His performance was unpersuasive.
Ko founded the TPP; it has always been a one-man party. The TPP needs him as its head; Huang knows this, and readily concedes it. At the rally, he referred to Ko as the party’s “chairman for life.” This is not simply loyalty; it is a recognition that without Ko, the party is headless; and that without Ko, he has no power.
Huang looks isolated, with support from the KMT in spirit only, and from a distance or very contingent on the KMT’s interests. He continues to bask in Ko’s glow, but this glow is in danger of being tarnished by the guilty verdict.
Huang’s performance on Sunday was preaching to the converted and would win no more support for the party. The more politically savvy KMT is planning how to continue playing Huang and the TPP.
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS