On most days, India quietly does something that no other country has ever done at such a scale: It moves money instantly, billions of times, for free. The country’s Unified Payments Interface (UPI) has unleashed a financial revolution that runs silently in the background of chai stalls, small shops and cabs. This success story is no longer just about fintech. It signals India’s arrival as a global economic and high-tech superpower.
In 2024, UPI processed about 172 billion transactions, up 46 percent from the year before, and a staggering 247 trillion rupees (US$2.71 trillion) moved along this free money highway, according to the National Payments Corporation of India.
For comparison, Visa’s global network processed about 234 billion transactions in 2024, and Mastercard about 160 billion. In other words, a piece of Indian public infrastructure that operates at zero cost to consumers is already playing in the same league as the world’s private payment giants and growing faster than both.
Another comparison is China, whose Alipay and WeChat Pay platforms have created one of the world’s largest mobile payment ecosystems. In 2024, mobile payments via Alipay and WeChat Pay exceeded US$80 trillion in value, with Alipay handling more than 120 million transactions a day and WeChat Pay surpassing one billion transactions daily.
Unlike the systems in China, India’s is an open and fully interoperable public platform that every bank and fintech can plug into. Data from the Reserve Bank of India show that UPI accounts for more than 80 percent of all digital payment volumes in India, and that digital payments themselves constitute most of the payment volume in the country. A global assessment by ACI Worldwide said that UPI represents about 49 percent of all fast-payment transactions globally, making it the single largest real-time payments system anywhere. These numbers do more than reflect the size of one system; they speak to a global shift in the center of economic gravity.
UPI rests on India’s broader digital public infrastructure, the famous JAM trinity: Jan Dhan bank accounts, Aadhaar identity and mobile phones. India has more than 530 million Jan Dhan accounts, many held by women and rural residents. These accounts serve as basic sockets into which UPI can plug. Any smartphone with a data plan and a QR code becomes a digital point-of-sale terminal.
Then there is the RuPay program. Launched as India’s domestic debit-card network, it built scale through government financial-inclusion initiatives, with more than 360 million RuPay cards issued through Jan Dhan alone. RuPay credit cards were later permitted to operate on UPI and the network experienced explosive growth. By 2024, RuPay had captured 12 to 14 percent of India’s card-transaction volume, up from just 3 percent the previous year. Estimates suggest that RuPay holds about 18 percent of the credit-card market and accounts for about 40 percent of all UPI credit card transactions by volume. Between April and October 2024, RuPay credit cards accounted for more than 750 million UPI transactions.
India has not only created a domestic alternative to Visa and Mastercard; it has done so within its instant, zero-fee retail payments grid. For a country that has lived through foreign-exchange shortages and external vulnerabilities in the past, this kind of sovereignty over payments infrastructure is strategically transformational.
Perhaps the most radical feature of UPI is its low cost. Transactions are free for all consumers and the fees are negligible for small merchants compared to traditional card merchant charges. This is no accident. India treats digital payments as public infrastructure, not as a premium private service. That is why UPI was able to grow to 400 million ordinary users by 2024, up from 30 million in 2017. This is financial inclusion at a national scale, not a mere slogan.
The UPI-PayNow linkage with Singapore is live, enabling instant, low-cost cross-border transfers. UPI is accepted in Bhutan, Nepal, the United Arab Emirates, Mauritius, Sri Lanka and France. India and the United Arab Emirates are working to link UPI with Emirati payment systems and India is exploring integration with Europe’s TARGET Instant Payment Settlement network.
Imagine Indian travelers paying in Dubai or Paris using the same UPI app they use to buy vegetables back home. Imagine foreign tourists using their own apps to pay on UPI rails in India. Payments are becoming a two-way diplomatic bridge, with UPI emerging as the sharpest soft-power instrument at India’s disposal.
India has shown that it can design and operate the world’s largest real-time payments system; that inclusion and scale go together; and that a public, interoperable model can compete with and surpass the most powerful private networks. UPI and RuPay offer not just a cheaper way to pay, but a template that developing countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America could study if they want to achieve rapid digital-payments growth without being dependent on a few multinational corporations. It is no wonder that international organizations cite India’s digital-payments architecture as a global benchmark.
When a country can move money more than 170 billion times per year across a billion people, instantly and almost without cost, and when it starts exporting that capability, it is no longer just participating in the global economy, but shaping it. UPI is not merely a payments innovation. It is India’s quiet but unmistakable message that the world’s digital financial highways could one day flow through India.
Rishi Suri, a former director at the School of Policy and Governance in India, is a media fellow at the Australia India Council.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The