Former legislator-at-large Kolas Yotaka has spoken out on numerous occasions about Taiwan’s electoral system for indigenous candidates and constituents. Despite living in Taipei’s Daan District (大安), she is not eligible to stand as a general legislative candidate in her area due to her indigenous status, which exemplifies the paradoxical situation in which indigenous Taiwanese all too often find themselves. Policies meant to offer protections in reality become limitations that only further deprive those in the community of their rights.
Indigenous legislative constituencies function differently across government levels. While representatives in mountain townships do not necessarily have to hold indigenous status, their mayors do. At the county level, there is a minimum for indigenous councilors and only those officially recognized as indigenous have the right to run or vote in those elections.
To truly protect indigenous political participation rights, a model closer to the school list system should be implemented, in which indigenous enrollment quotas act as a minimum safeguard, not a hard cap. Indigenous Taiwanese should be able to run as candidates and vote in the general electoral roll without renouncing their indigenous status — and all of the welfare benefits associated with it.
A further issue is the crude distinction drawn between “mountains” and “plains” indigenous groups, with separate voting and candidate pools for seats in each category. Originally a colonial concept, the classification system was brought into law when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) first arrived in Taiwan. Today, the reality is that indigenous Taiwanese live all across the country, so drawing a line between plains and mountainous identities and constituencies is meaningless and restrictive. As such, a single, unified indigenous classification should be adopted instead.
Chen Chi-nung is the principal of a junior-high school in Nantou County.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS