The New Taipei City mayoral race should have been a matter of local politics. Instead, due to political coordination between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), along with maneuvering by TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), it has devolved into an absurd spectacle centered around one individual’s political survival.
Huang has publicly stated that, although the TPP ostensibly maintains the principle of forming the strongest possible team with the KMT, he personally does not rule out throwing in his lot with the campaign of Deputy Taipei Mayor Lee Shu-chuan (李四川), who has already submitted his resignation to prepare for a mayoral run. Such an absurd declaration is more than just strategic maneuvering — it exposes the loosening of party boundaries. Party identity, individual political survival and voter expectations have all become entangled in an unsolvable triangle.
The KMT-TPP political coordination is not merely a strategic arrangement, but a transactional operation conducted under the guise of democracy. In a reality where he has been largely rejected by the public, what Huang seems to care about is how to sustain his personal game of survival within the political arena. Ideals, sincerity and party loyalty have been all but stripped away, leaving only the convertibility of political capital.
What is even more absurd is that, as TPP chairman, Huang’s role should be to uphold the party’s boundaries and ideas, yet the party’s boundaries have become a strategic cushion for Huang and its symbols serve as endorsements of individual maneuvering. Under Huang’s calculations, voters’ ideals, expectations and political loyalty are reduced to mere byproducts — he delivers strategy when you expect sincerity and flexibility when you expect clear boundaries. This kind of manipulation reminds us that democracy can often become decoupled from political substance.
This election highlights a core dilemma in the nation’s local politics — the subtle, intertwined relationship between party boundaries, individual strategy and voters’ expectations. Cooperation between political parties might appear sincere, but it is, in reality, transactional. Individual statements might seem transparent and democratic, but they are merely extensions of a personal game of survival.
Voters do not just cast their ballots, they also become witnesses to and bearers of the flow of political capital. Only by understanding this can one avoid being misled by appearances.
Liu Che-ting is a writer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS