President William Lai (賴清德) on Sunday congratulated Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi and her Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) on their historic landslide victory in Japan’s general election.
The LDP secured the largest single-party majority in post-World War II Japan, winning 316 seats. The win is expected to strengthen ties with Japan’s allies and potentially deter Chinese aggression in the region.
American Institute in Taiwan Director Raymond Greene on Monday said that under Takaichi’s leadership, he anticipates deeper coordination among the US, Japan and Taiwan to promote regional stability and prosperity. US President Donald Trump has also shown his strong support for Takaichi, and is likely to endorse her plans for increased military spending.
Takaichi has outlined a broader security agenda, aiming to reduce legal restrictions on defense spending. This would enable Japan to develop a “normal” military capacity rather than maintaining a defensive force, the Financial Times said.
One aim of expanding the Japan Self-Defense Forces (JSDF) is to allow participation in matters of collective defense, such as aiding Taiwan in the event of a Chinese attack. Speaking in the Japanese National Diet in November last year, Takaichi said a conflict in the Taiwan Strait could be a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan, justifying the JSDF’s right to collective self-defense.
Her comments angered Beijing, which attempted to pressure her into retracting the statement. Foundation on Asia-Pacific Peace Studies CEO Dong Li-wen (董立文) attributed the LDP’s sweeping victory in part to Takaichi’s firm stance.
Beijing also tried to exploit historical tensions to drive a wedge between Tokyo and Seoul, but that too failed, as demonstrated by a meeting last month in Japan’s Nara Prefecture between Takaichi and South Korean President Lee Jae-myung, when the two appeared on stage together playing drums.
National Sun Yat-sen University’s Center for Japanese Studies director Kuo Yu-jen (郭育仁) said the election results could allow Takaichi to push forward a proposed ￥9.04 trillion (US$57.8 billion) defense budget. About one-third of the spending is targeted at islands south of Kyushu, considered strategically critical in a Taiwan-related contingency. The LDP’s supermajority ensures there would be no legislative obstruction.
Institute for National Defense and Security Research director Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said Takaichi’s stance aligns with the US’ national security strategy emphasizing collective defense and could enhance stability in the Taiwan Strait, as well as industrial cooperation.
China has said its policies would not change based on a single election. Still, the LDP’s win is likely to give Beijing pause. Japanese involvement in a Taiwan conflict could trigger Chinese attacks on Japanese territory, invoking US intervention under the US-Japan security treaty. Even the threat of Japanese and US participation could serve as a deterrent.
Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association Chief Representative Kazuyuki Katayama emphasized Taiwan’s importance to Japan’s survival and called for cooperation to strengthen supply chains.
“From the perspective of economic security, it is vital to build supply chains and cultivate talent from both sides, as well as from third countries,” Katayama said.
Collaboration in chips and artificial intelligence could also enhance both nations’ military capabilities.
Analysts note that Takaichi’s firm stance might raise tensions with Beijing, but China was already engaged in regional competition. Takaichi’s efforts to strengthen the JSDF are arguably long overdue. China has increased transits through the Miyako Strait, conducted drills with Russia in the Sea of Japan, and questioned Japan’s sovereignty over Okinawa Prefecture. During military drills in 2022 following then-US House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan, China fired rockets into waters near Okinawa.
Japan has moved to protect its islands through radar and missile-defense deployments. It sees threats to Taiwan as threats to itself.
Takaichi has signaled that Japan and Taiwan should work together on defense, supply-chain resilience and democratic values, and some have suggested her administration might pursue an economic partnership agreement with Taiwan. Lai and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs have expressed a strong desire to deepen practical cooperation.
However, given rising Sino-Japanese tensions and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) desire for closer ties with Beijing, it remains uncertain whether Taiwan’s cross-party legislators can reach consensus on Japanese cooperation. Enchanted to see friends as foes and foes as friends, the KMT stumbles toward danger. Its stated goal is to avoid war, yet a closer partnership with Japan might be the surest path to achieving that aim.
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS