Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has just scored an unprecedented victory in the country’s general election. The ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which she leads, won 316 seats in the 465-member Japanese House of Representatives (the Japanese Diet’s lower house), up sharply from 198. The combined strength of two parties that had merged hastily — despite their fundamentally opposing platforms — to bring Takaichi down fell from 167 seats to just 49. The LDP, which celebrated its 70th anniversary last year, has never looked more robust.
Only moments after Takaichi became the LDP’s president in October last year, the party’s coalition partner of a quarter-century, Komeito, abruptly defected. With that, there was no guarantee that she could secure a majority in the lower house to become prime minister. Then, after she dissolved the chamber and called a general election to obtain a stronger mandate, Komeito, backed by disciplined religious voters, quickly merged with the largest opposition force, the liberal Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan.
Takaichi survived the first shock by forming a new coalition with a smaller party closer to her own policy line. She crushed the second challenge by setting the period for election campaigning to an unprecedentedly brief 16 days, leaving the new opposition alliance scant time to build name recognition.
The prime minister is herself something of a newcomer, having risen to the party presidency in a political culture that long assumed that a politician, and certainly a national leader, must be male. Rather than relying on the usual social circles that fostered the careers of her senior colleagues, she nurtured her ambitions on her own.
Casting herself as the lead actor, she wrote the script and directed the plot to stage an election in which a maverick heroine clears one obstacle after another, growing stronger each time, before finally reaching an apparently invincible position. Voters seemed captivated by the narrative. Even seasoned commentators failed to foresee how many first-time voters would turn out.
Takaichi plans to overhaul the way Japan drafts its national budget. During the campaign, she repeatedly stressed that she needed political capital precisely for that purpose. For decades, the country has relied on a two-step process: a modest initial budget at the start of the fiscal year, followed by a supplementary budget six months later to cover shortfalls. Takaichi wants to abolish this practice and rely on a single budget at the start of the year. With the end of routine supplementary budgets, the fiscal stance would shift away from the austerity regime that has shaped the economy for three decades.
Japan has no time, she said throughout the campaign. Whether the challenge is to reduce dependence on China for critical minerals, build advanced crop factories to strengthen food self-sufficiency, or update military platforms to match the technologies revealed in Ukraine to be essential to war fighting, Japan must act or risk losing the opportunity to do so in the future. A country that stops addressing its challenges has no future, she said.
Voters appear to have embraced that ambitious vision.
Even so, this is only the beginning. Unlike the lower house, the Diet’s upper house cannot be dissolved by the prime minister. Its next regular election is not due until 2028. If the LDP, still a minority faction there, can strengthen its position as decisively as it has in the lower house, it could secure the two-thirds majorities in both chambers that are required to initiate constitutional change, a cause which Takaichi inherited from her mentor, the late Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe. To win any subsequent national referendum on constitutional reform, the government would need strong backing from both houses.
Japan’s constitution has never been amended, an extraordinary exception among democracies. A clause renouncing the possession of the means of war has long functioned as a convenient fiction. Takaichi wants to correct this, and she has made explicit recognition of the constitutionality of Japan’s armed forces central to the LDP’s identity. However, achieving that goal would require at least three more years of sustained commitment.
Whether an aging Japan can transform itself in short order under a maverick prime minister remains uncertain. Yet some economists argue that the demographic clock might not be as unforgiving as often assumed. If female and elderly labor-force participation were each to rise by 10 percentage points, and if the productivity gains expected from artificial intelligence are added to the equation, Japan could offset much of its demographic drag without relying heavily on immigration. While this possibility (still debated) does not eliminate the urgency of reform, it does suggest that the country retains more room for maneuver than is commonly believed.
For now, Takaichi is wagering that voters are ready for a more assertive course. If she can convert electoral capital into sustained structural change, her victory could mark the start of a new political cycle in Japan. If not, it would be remembered as a spectacular, but fleeting moment. We will soon find out which future will prevail.
Tomohiko Taniguchi, a former special adviser to late Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe, is chairman of Nippon Kaigi (Japan Conference), a conservative lobbying organization.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength