The Taiwan Association for Sexuality Education, the Chinese Association for the Development of Affective Education and the Action Alliance on Basic Education on Monday advocated for the implementation of more comprehensive sex education programs, saying that more emphasis must be placed on interpersonal relationships and emotional awareness.
The call came as the three groups revealed their top 10 most impactful sexual and reproductive health news stories from last year, with the top-voted story being about the significant increase in child and youth sexual exploitation cases since 2017.
Data from the Ministry of Health and Welfare showed that reported sexual exploitation victims under 18 years old rose from 1,691 in 2020 to 5,092 in 2024, while cases involving children under 12 skyrocketed more than 22-fold, from 153 to 3,372. While improved reporting mechanisms might partly account for this rise, the scale of growth points to a structural vulnerability.
Recent incidents involving organized exploitation rings, the filming and circulation of sexual images of minors and abuse perpetrated by authority figures have further brought to light systemic safeguarding failures.
Together, the data and case records suggest that Taiwan’s current prevention framework is lagging behind the realities children face. The public is right to call for a fundamental overhaul of sex education. Instruction still leans heavily toward anatomy, reproduction and contraception — important subjects, but insufficient to prevent young people falling victim to sexual exploitation.
A modern curriculum must be developed to equip students with practical protective competencies.
First, it is crucial that children understand bodily autonomy — that they possess inviolable rights over their own bodies, regardless of pressure, hierarchy or circumstance.
An effective curriculum would also discuss the issue of consent and the nuance behind it — that coercion can be emotional, psychological or situational, and acquiescence under pressure does not constitute genuine agreement.
Students must also understand power asymmetry. Relationships involving teachers, coaches, employers or other authority figures are inherently unequal, and solicitation in such contexts is an abuse of power, not an interpersonal exchange.
There is also a need to help students develop digital literacy. The proliferation of social media has radically lowered barriers to the exploitation of minors. Reports of child sexual abuse material linked to Taiwanese IP addresses more than doubled from 33,621 in 2019 to 72,902 in 2022. In 2024, roughly 70 percent of youth sexual exploitation cases involved online platforms. Meanwhile, the average age of initial Internet exposure is now just 7.1 years.
This digital shift means that children must be taught to navigate dangers in online spaces — from grooming tactics to data harvesting and the lasting consequences of their own digital footprints. Knowing how to recognize manipulation and where to seek help are the baseline of safety competencies.
Parents undoubtedly play a role in the educational process. Before allowing unsupervised online access, it is important to understand the associated risks and take steps to mitigate potential harm.
Today’s youth are the first “digital generation,” but not the last. Exposure to online dangers is an unavoidable truth for all children. Preparedness must be institutionalized. Schools should introduce comprehensive, age-appropriate modules no later than the middle-school level, supported by community outreach and public health campaigns. Parents should be encouraged to build their own digital literacy and maintain open, judgement-free conversations with their children about what they encounter in digital spaces.
Legal deterrence must evolve alongside education. Amendments to the Child and Youth Sexual Exploitation Prevention Act (兒童及少年性剝削防制條例) in 2024, which raised penalties for paying to view sexual content involving minors, marked progress. Yet, a minimum sentence of one year understates the impact of such crimes. Stronger possession, purchase and distribution penalties would better align Taiwan with international enforcement norms.
Additionally, the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence has introduced new forms of image-based abuse, including the fabrication of pornographic material using minors’ faces. Regulatory agencies must be equipped with the technical capacity to identify such content, and the authority to remove it and hold hosting platforms legally accountable. Every effort must be made to ensure that laws keep pace with technological innovation.
Child exploitation is a complex issue spanning education, technology governance, criminal law and personal awareness. Addressing it is an arduous process, but equipping today’s youth with the knowledge to protect themselves is a necessary first step.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS