Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations.
The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power.
Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both.
The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, after receiving support from Trump for the US-Japan alliance, won the general election with the most votes in history. This highlights strong public support in Japan for Takaichi’s clear strategic stance that a “Taiwan contingency” could amount to a threat to Japan’s national security.
Taken together, these developments clearly demonstrate strategic deployments to counter China — using overwhelming military strength to safeguard peace in the Taiwan Strait and prevent the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) from crossing that line by even a single step.
During the summit between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) scheduled for late this month, the US might need China to purchase large quantities of soybeans or increase investment and China appears to have room to use Taiwan as a bargaining chip in exchange for trade and economic concessions.
However, in safeguarding US geopolitical, economic and strategic interests, Trump has already demonstrated that, under his “America first” framework, “Taiwan is Taiwan” — separate issues must be addressed one at a time.
It would be impossible to sacrifice Taiwan in exchange for US-China trade benefits.
With Taiwan’s geopolitical position and its critical importance in high technology and maritime shipping, if China were to attack Taiwan, global GDP could fall by US$10 trillion, plunging the world into an economic crisis comparable to the Great Depression. The US would likely weaken as a result and the economic losses and severe blow to overall US national power would far exceed any economic benefits Washington might hope to gain from Beijing.
Due to Taiwan’s strategic importance in the Indo-Pacific region, its central role in advanced semiconductor technology and its position in global maritime shipping — alongside the fact that Taiwanese semiconductors are a key force behind making the US “great again” — to safeguard its economic interests and its strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific, the US is likely to follow the models applied in Iran and Venezuela.
It would continue strengthening its military presence in the Indo-Pacific region, increase the quality and quantity of arms sales to Taiwan and deepen military cooperation with Taipei, using overwhelming force to protect peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait and the broader Indo-Pacific region.
In light of this, pro-China and anti-US politicians from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) should come to their senses.
The US is using overwhelming military strength to safeguard its interests.
Meanwhile, China’s economy is faltering, with foreign companies and Taiwanese businesses continuously withdrawing.
If the pan-blue camp remains oblivious to international realities, rejects public opinion and blindly places its hopes on China while opposing the US — such as by blocking the NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.55 billion) special defense budget and hindering US-Taiwan trade agreements — it could become an enemy of the public.
Such behavior would not only endanger Taiwan’s national security and put it at odds with the US, but would harm the KMT’s prospects in elections this year and in 2028.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat formerly posted in the US.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
When 17,000 troops from the US, the Philippines, Australia, Japan, Canada, France and New Zealand spread across the Philippine archipelago for the Balikatan military exercise, running from tomorrow through May 8, the official language would be about interoperability, readiness and regional peace. However, the strategic subtext is becoming harder to ignore: The exercises are increasingly about the military geography around Taiwan. Balikatan has always carried political weight. This year, however, the exercise looks different in ways that matter not only to Manila and Washington, but also to Taipei. What began in 2023 as a shift toward a more serious deterrence posture