For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first.
Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable.
Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent threat.
Preventive war seeks to eliminate a potential danger before it materializes.
That distinction is the line separating order from opportunism.
Several respected international law scholars have argued that the threshold of imminence was not met in Iran’s case. There was no publicly available evidence that Iran was on the verge of launching an attack, nor that it possessed operational nuclear weapons ready for use.
If the rationale rests on stopping a future capability rather than countering an imminent assault, the justification shifts from defensive necessity to strategic choice.
Strategic choice is precisely what the US condemned elsewhere.
When Russian President Vladimir Putin invoked NATO expansion and future security risks to justify the invasion of Ukraine, Washington rejected the logic outright.
Hypothetical threats do not authorize war, it insisted.
International order cannot survive if states attack whenever they perceive a possible future disadvantage.
If that principle bends, its authority weakens.
Beijing has long described Taiwan’s democratic consolidation, its military modernization and growing security ties with Washington as destabilizing trends.
The language of “future threat” already exists in Chinese strategic discourse. If preventive force becomes normalized in practice, that language gains rhetorical ammunition.
Precedent shapes perception. Perception shapes risk.
International norms survive not because they are universally obeyed, but because they are consistently defended.
When leading democracies carve out exceptions, the shield surrounding smaller democracies thins.
Taiwan’s leaders cannot afford distance from Washington; US support remains the cornerstone of deterrence.
However, uncritical endorsement of legally contested action risks undermining Taiwan’s own long-standing argument that power must be constrained by rules.
At home, the government must ensure that the public is acutely aware of cross-strait danger, while navigating partisan scrutiny.
Abroad, it must demonstrate reliability as an ally without surrendering the normative ground that distinguishes Taiwan from the authoritarian model it resists.
It is a narrow corridor — alliance solidarity on one side, legal consistency on the other.
Deterrence without legitimacy invites suspicion. Legitimacy without deterrence invites pressure. Taiwan has no luxury of choosing between the two.
The deeper danger lies in normalization.
Once preventive war becomes routine rather than exceptional, the vocabulary of “anticipated threat” becomes available to every major power.
In East Asia, that vocabulary carries explosive implications.
Taiwan’s security has always depended not only on military balance, but on the integrity of the rules-based order. When those rules appear selective, their deterrent value erodes.
When the ground shifts beneath international law, Taiwan stands closer to the fault line than most.
Bonnie Yushih Liao is an assistant professor in Tamkang University’s Department of Diplomacy and International Relations.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS