Taipei and Tokyo must deepen cooperation on the economy and regional security, Japan’s representative to Taiwan said in an interview on Saturday.
Taiwan’s strength lies in semiconductor production, accounting for 70 percent of global output and 90 percent of the world’s most advanced chips, while Japan excels in materials and manufacturing equipment, Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association Representative Kazuyuki Katayama said.
“From the perspective of economic security, it is vital to build supply chains and cooperate in cultivating talent from both sides, as well as from third countries,” he said.
Taiwan and Japan could work together on artificial intelligence (AI), disaster prevention and relief, environmental energy, public health, drones and the security of undersea cables — all areas of concern to both countries.
Japan-Taiwan relations are widely regarded as having reached a modern high point during the administration of late Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe, especially during his second term (from 2012 to 2020), when he said that “a Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency.”
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has reiterated that sentiment, saying in November last year that a conflict between Taiwan and China could become an “existential crisis for Japan,” potentially leading to the deployment of the Japan Self-Defense Forces.
Beijing demanded that Takaichi retract the remarks, which she did not, suggesting that Tokyo’s strong support for Taiwan could act as a deterrent against a Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) invasion.
Any Japanese involvement in a potential Taiwan-China conflict would likely result in PLA attacks on Japanese territory, and according to the 1960 US-Japan Security Treaty, Washington is obligated to respond if Japan is under attack.
Deepened Taiwan-Japan economic cooperation — including Japanese direct investment in Taiwan’s tech sector or the deployment of Japanese engineers to Taiwanese facilities — would make Taiwan’s defense an even greater strategic concern for Tokyo, increasing the likelihood of Japanese, and subsequently US, involvement in a conflict in the Strait.
Strengthening collaboration on the defense of undersea communications cables would also reduce the risk of an Internet blackout in Taiwan caused by severed marine cables — a tactic China has already demonstrated it could employ in the lead-up to a conflict. If Tokyo partially or fully invests in these cables, any sabotage could be interpreted as an attack on Japan itself, further enhancing deterrence.
Creating such deterrents is especially urgent as Taiwan’s main opposition party, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), has stalled efforts by the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to increase defense spending. Public concerns have also arisen over meetings in Beijing this week between Chinese Communist Party officials and a delegation led by KMT Vice Chairman Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), given the lack of transparency regarding what is being discussed.
While the DPP has limited legislative recourse — as the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party combined have majority of legislative seats — it can engage directly with Tokyo. Meetings with Takaichi and members of the Liberal Democratic Party could clarify the scope of possible economic and military cooperation according to existing laws and budgets, and explore avenues for Japanese investment in Taiwan’s technology sector.
President William Lai (賴清德) has made it a priority to increase government investment in AI, while Japan is also promoting growth in the AI and semiconductor sectors. As Katayama said, the strengths of Taiwan and Japan are complementary: Japan excels in materials and equipment, while Taiwan leads in advanced chip manufacturing. Both countries are comparatively weak in AI software and models, presenting a strong opportunity for collaboration. Linking their industries could facilitate the development of a robust “non-red” supply chain.
Building a non-red supply chain would also align with US trade policy, allowing better integration among the three partners. Speaking at a news conference on Tuesday, Lai said that Taiwan possesses world-class manufacturing capabilities, while the US offers a robust ecosystem of innovation, access to core technologies and global market connections, making a partnership between Taiwan and the US highly strategic.
The US would remain a vital economic partner for Taiwan, but Japan is also an industrial leader and a neighbor who shares Taiwan’s concerns about a belligerent China. Taiwan should seek to integrate its high-tech sectors with those of Japan and the US. As Katayama suggested, these partners thrive best when their relationship is complementary rather than competitive.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS