Taipei and Tokyo must deepen cooperation on the economy and regional security, Japan’s representative to Taiwan said in an interview on Saturday.
Taiwan’s strength lies in semiconductor production, accounting for 70 percent of global output and 90 percent of the world’s most advanced chips, while Japan excels in materials and manufacturing equipment, Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association Representative Kazuyuki Katayama said.
“From the perspective of economic security, it is vital to build supply chains and cooperate in cultivating talent from both sides, as well as from third countries,” he said.
Taiwan and Japan could work together on artificial intelligence (AI), disaster prevention and relief, environmental energy, public health, drones and the security of undersea cables — all areas of concern to both countries.
Japan-Taiwan relations are widely regarded as having reached a modern high point during the administration of late Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe, especially during his second term (from 2012 to 2020), when he said that “a Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency.”
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has reiterated that sentiment, saying in November last year that a conflict between Taiwan and China could become an “existential crisis for Japan,” potentially leading to the deployment of the Japan Self-Defense Forces.
Beijing demanded that Takaichi retract the remarks, which she did not, suggesting that Tokyo’s strong support for Taiwan could act as a deterrent against a Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) invasion.
Any Japanese involvement in a potential Taiwan-China conflict would likely result in PLA attacks on Japanese territory, and according to the 1960 US-Japan Security Treaty, Washington is obligated to respond if Japan is under attack.
Deepened Taiwan-Japan economic cooperation — including Japanese direct investment in Taiwan’s tech sector or the deployment of Japanese engineers to Taiwanese facilities — would make Taiwan’s defense an even greater strategic concern for Tokyo, increasing the likelihood of Japanese, and subsequently US, involvement in a conflict in the Strait.
Strengthening collaboration on the defense of undersea communications cables would also reduce the risk of an Internet blackout in Taiwan caused by severed marine cables — a tactic China has already demonstrated it could employ in the lead-up to a conflict. If Tokyo partially or fully invests in these cables, any sabotage could be interpreted as an attack on Japan itself, further enhancing deterrence.
Creating such deterrents is especially urgent as Taiwan’s main opposition party, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), has stalled efforts by the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to increase defense spending. Public concerns have also arisen over meetings in Beijing this week between Chinese Communist Party officials and a delegation led by KMT Vice Chairman Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), given the lack of transparency regarding what is being discussed.
While the DPP has limited legislative recourse — as the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party combined have majority of legislative seats — it can engage directly with Tokyo. Meetings with Takaichi and members of the Liberal Democratic Party could clarify the scope of possible economic and military cooperation according to existing laws and budgets, and explore avenues for Japanese investment in Taiwan’s technology sector.
President William Lai (賴清德) has made it a priority to increase government investment in AI, while Japan is also promoting growth in the AI and semiconductor sectors. As Katayama said, the strengths of Taiwan and Japan are complementary: Japan excels in materials and equipment, while Taiwan leads in advanced chip manufacturing. Both countries are comparatively weak in AI software and models, presenting a strong opportunity for collaboration. Linking their industries could facilitate the development of a robust “non-red” supply chain.
Building a non-red supply chain would also align with US trade policy, allowing better integration among the three partners. Speaking at a news conference on Tuesday, Lai said that Taiwan possesses world-class manufacturing capabilities, while the US offers a robust ecosystem of innovation, access to core technologies and global market connections, making a partnership between Taiwan and the US highly strategic.
The US would remain a vital economic partner for Taiwan, but Japan is also an industrial leader and a neighbor who shares Taiwan’s concerns about a belligerent China. Taiwan should seek to integrate its high-tech sectors with those of Japan and the US. As Katayama suggested, these partners thrive best when their relationship is complementary rather than competitive.
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
During the long Lunar New Year’s holiday, Taiwan has shown several positive developments in different aspects of society, hinting at a hopeful outlook for the Year of the Horse, but there are also significant challenges that the country must cautiously navigate with strength, wisdom and resilience. Before the holiday break, Taiwan’s stock market closed at a record 10,080.3 points and the TAIEX wrapped up at a record-high 33,605.71 points, while Taipei and Washington formally signed the Taiwan-US Agreement on Reciprocal Trade that caps US tariffs on Taiwanese goods at 15 percent and secures Taiwan preferential tariff treatment. President William Lai (賴清德) in
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Deputy Chairman Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) earlier this month led a delegation to Beijing to attend a think tank forum between the KMT and Chinese Communist Party (CCP). After returning to Taiwan, Hsiao spoke at length about “accumulating mutual trust” and letting matters “fall into place,” portraying the forum as a series of discussions focused on cooperation in tourism, renewable energy, disaster prevention, emerging industries, health and medicine, and artificial intelligence (AI). However, when the entire dialogue presupposes the so-called “1992 consensus — the idea that there is only “one China,” with each side of the Taiwan