The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) last month officially announced that Zhang Yuxia (張又俠), vice chairman of the CCP’s Central Military Commission (CMC), as well as General Liu Zhenli (劉振立), chief of staff of the CMC’s Joint Staff Department, were being investigated for suspected contraventions of the law, confirming speculation in the rest of the world that China had purged more high-level military personnel.
The purge was not just an anti-corruption campaign, but also a blatant political security operation. For Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the military is not professional armed forces, but the final insurance policy of his regime. Any officials who do not pledge “absolute loyalty” to him must be eliminated.
Serving as the first vice chairman of the CMC, Zhang was only subordinate to Xi, while Liu controlled the commission’s pivotal joint staff affairs. Both being investigated at the same time showed that Xi has completely lost trust in the chain of military command.
Even if there is no clear sign of a substantial coup d’etat, as long as there is a potential uncontrollable risk, it is enough to trigger his logic of “striking first to gain an upper hand.”
This is the governance model of “better to kill 100 by mistake than to spare one who is guilty.”
Such a governance model might lead to a chilling effect instead of stability — officers are only loyal to individuals, the decisionmaking process becomes conservative and rigid, and military professionalism is replaced by political loyalty.
Internal unrest does not necessarily reduce the risk of external conflict, while it might prompt the leadership to shift internal pressure through tougher external measures.
As for Taiwan, the key is not betting on the direction of Beijing’s power struggles. It lies in recognizing that when the CCP uses its military as a political tool, uncertainty over regional security only increases.
Wang Hao is a political commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
On Sunday, elite free solo climber Alex Honnold — famous worldwide for scaling sheer rock faces without ropes — climbed Taipei 101, once the world’s tallest building and still the most recognizable symbol of Taiwan’s modern identity. Widespread media coverage not only promoted Taiwan, but also saw the Republic of China (ROC) flag fluttering beside the building, breaking through China’s political constraints on Taiwan. That visual impact did not happen by accident. Credit belongs to Taipei 101 chairwoman Janet Chia (賈永婕), who reportedly took the extra step of replacing surrounding flags with the ROC flag ahead of the climb. Just
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS