After Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi last week announced her plans to dissolve the Japanese parliament and call a snap election, some people saw this as a potential model for institutional reform. However, what people should pay attention to is whether Taiwan’s political parties have the capacity to ensure the country’s regular functioning.
Taiwan and Japan share the conundrum of the governing party holding a minority of seats. However, unlike in Taiwan, the Japanese prime minister can dissolve parliament in the event of a political deadlock and call snap elections to seek a new mandate.
Taiwan’s system is closer to a presidential model with separation of powers. It features checks and balances between the government branches, but lacks institutional mechanisms for resolving deadlocks. Once political parties refuse to cooperate, governance grinds to a halt.
The budget debacle last year was evidence enough. The opposition made history with the scale of their budget reductions, and forced the Executive Yuan to file for reconsideration six times. Meanwhile, procedural committees have repeatedly blocked filings and raised black-box proposals, gradually paralyzing democratic controls. The outcome has not been bolstered oversight, and checks and balances, but a stagnation of government functions.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party must take their positions seriously. Being in opposition does not necessitate blanket rejections, and oversight need not equal total paralysis.
Multi-party democracies have long demonstrated that cooperation and policy negotiations are key to preventing national derailment. When the opposition always angles for confrontation and indiscriminately blocks whatever they can, it comes at the expense of Taiwanese.
The challenge is not whether Taiwan could recreate Japan’s mechanism for parliamentary dissolution, but whether it could bring politics and the legislature back to reality.
An unwillingness to shoulder governance responsibility only exacerbates systemic failures. Democracy is not a race to shut down the government, it is a test of who can work together to keep the country moving forward despite disagreements.
Yang Chih-chiang is a teacher.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS