Jim Geraghty, senior political columnist for the National Review, on Wednesday published an op-ed in the Washington Post discussing whether US President Donald Trump might abandon Taiwan. He interpreted the Taiwan-US tariff negotiations and restructuring of the semiconductor supply chain as “slightly ominous” signals for Taiwan’s security.
At first glance, the article appears to express concern about Taiwan’s future — however, in reality, it relies on an outdated security framework that not only misreads Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) role, but overlooks the true core of security in the Taiwan Strait.
In the article, Geraghty reduces Taiwan’s security to the simplistic question of whether the so-called “silicon shield” is weakening and argues that once the US achieves “semiconductor independence” by 2029, Taiwan’s strategic value would decline accordingly. This notion fundamentally misunderstands TSMC’s business model and the logic of its global footprint.
TSMC’s investments in the US do not represent an exodus from Taiwan, nor do they entail that core technologies would be leaked. Rather, they are capacity allocations necessary to meet the growth of global demand and enhance supply chain resilience.
Even absent US fabs, TSMC would still expand investment in Japan, Germany or other regions. What Geraghty fails to understand is that the most critical elements — process research-and-development, management systems, and accumulated knowledge — remain firmly anchored in Taiwan. The very essence of the silicon shield has never been shaken.
Furthermore, Taiwan’s security has never relied solely on TSMC. Security is a complex concept encompassing economic, military and political dimensions. Even if the importance of semiconductors were to diminish, that would in no way imply that the US would lose its motivation to deter China. Any conflict in the Taiwan Strait would generate massive spillover effects that would severely impact neighboring countries such as Japan, South Korea and the Philippines, inflicting serious damage on the global economy and US strategic interests. The idea that the US would simply stand by and watch from across the ocean is untenable.
This is precisely the key assessment that Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has repeatedly expressed. Moreover, the latest US National Security Strategy report made it abundantly clear that Taiwan matters to the US not merely because of semiconductors, but because Taiwan occupies a critical node in the first island chain, directly impacting the overall architecture of US Indo-Pacific security.
Finally — and most often deliberately overlooked — is that regardless of how US attitudes might shift, China’s ambition to annex Taiwan has never changed. What Taiwanese truly need to earnestly discuss is not endless speculation over whether the US “would come to our rescue,” but how the international community could reduce China’s incentives to use force, and how Taiwan itself could continue to strengthen its defense capabilities, enhance societal resilience and forge consensus across the political spectrum.
Placing focus on conjecture surrounding the will of other countries would only push Taiwan into a position of passivity and anxiety, ultimately weakening our judgement and ability to take action when confronting real threats.
Wang Hung-jen is a professor in National Cheng Kung University’s Department of Political Science.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
An elderly mother and her daughter were found dead in Kaohsiung after having not been seen for several days, discovered only when a foul odor began to spread and drew neighbors’ attention. There have been many similar cases, but it is particularly troubling that some of the victims were excluded from the social welfare safety net because they did not meet eligibility criteria. According to media reports, the middle-aged daughter had sought help from the local borough warden. Although the warden did step in, many services were unavailable without out-of-pocket payments due to issues with eligibility, leaving the warden’s hands
When former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) first took office in 2016, she set ambitious goals for remaking the energy mix in Taiwan. At the core of this effort was a significant expansion of the percentage of renewable energy generated to keep pace with growing domestic and global demands to reduce emissions. This effort met with broad bipartisan support as all three major parties placed expanding renewable energy at the center of their energy platforms. However, over the past several years partisanship has become a major headwind in realizing a set of energy goals that all three parties profess to want. Tsai
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesman Randhir Jaiswal told a news conference on Jan. 9, in response to China’s latest round of live-fire exercises in the Taiwan Strait: “India has an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our trade, economic, people-to-people and maritime interests. We urge all parties to exercise restraint, avoid unilateral actions and resolve issues peacefully without threat or use of force.” The statement set a firm tone at the beginning of the year for India-Taiwan relations, and reflects New Delhi’s recognition of shared interests and the strategic importance of regional stability. While India
RSS