Pessimism about artificial intelligence (AI) abounds, with many fearing widespread job losses, soaring inequality and even the creation of deadly machines. However, in Japan one finds marked optimism. We believe AI would help our country to overcome acute labor shortages, improve people’s daily lives and recover global tech leadership.
According to an Ipsos survey, one-quarter of Japanese feel anxious about AI’s predicted impact on their lives — the lowest share of the 32 countries surveyed. Only about one in 10 Japanese believe AI would make the future worse, a far cry from the more than one-third of Americans who are pessimistic about the technology.
This divergence reflects several factors, but one of the most important might be Japan’s long history of working with machines. It is easy for us to imagine AI-powered applications and devices that aid, not replace, humans. At a time when Japan’s labor pool is shrinking — 30 percent of Japanese are already aged 65 and older — AI labor savings would be key to boosting productivity and saving critical industries.
It is with this future in mind that my company, Rakuten Group, has invested in developing large language models and small language models optimized for the Japanese language and culture. We are using AI to transform critical services, such as mobile networks. Instead of the vendor-locked, hardware-centric networks of the past, Rakuten Mobile’s network makes flexible systems possible, enabling operators to mix and match components, while also minimizing energy consumption. Potential glitches are reported, reviewed, and fixed — all at a distance. Software upgrades are pushed out frequently. The network “learns” and makes fixes autonomously.
This innovation depends on an enabling regulatory environment. Fortunately, Japan has so far taken an “innovation-first” approach to AI governance. Japan’s AI Promotion Act, passed last year, imposes no stringent rules or penalties that could stifle AI adoption or experimentation, and creates space for close cooperation between the public and private sectors. As noted in a 2024 white paper, the goal is to make Japan the world’s “most AI-friendly country.”
This contrasts with the EU’s focus on mitigating risks, reflected not only in its 2024 AI Act, but also in rules that limit access to data AI developers need. Other AI innovators lag behind Japan when it comes to establishing supportive environments. Some emphasize social stability and state-directed innovation, while others are bogged down by long legal battles between rights-holders and AI developers.
Japan’s AI optimism translates into AI-friendly policies. Japanese courts interpret our copyright framework to allow the use of third-party copyrighted works for training AI models. This access to data attracts leading US frontier AI firms, such as OpenAI, to collaborative efforts with Japan-based companies like mine.
To be sure, Japan recognizes the importance of ensuring the safe development of AI. It was under Japan’s presidency that the G7 launched its Hiroshima AI Process, aimed at promoting “safe, secure, and trustworthy AI worldwide” and providing “guidance for organizations developing and using the most advanced AI systems.” However, the resulting framework focuses not on stifling regulations or threats of fines. Instead, it aims to help companies design effective risk-management mechanisms and encourages transparent information-sharing and reporting.
While Japan’s AI-friendly approach is already bearing fruit, there are pitfalls the country must avoid. For starters, Japan must encourage wider adoption of AI tools: As it stands, only half of Japanese firms are using generative AI, compared with more than 90 percent in the US, China and Germany.
Japan must also avoid getting so hung up on small-scale AI adoption that we lose sight of the bigger picture — namely, the critical importance of generating our own global AI leaders. We must strengthen our energy and cloud infrastructure, investing in electricity production (preferably from clean sources), and accelerating data center permitting. We should avoid being swept up by counterproductive notions of “digital sovereignty,” instead encouraging Japanese innovators to collaborate with frontier firms from the US and elsewhere.
With our highly skilled population, supportive regulatory environment and openness to AI, Japan is well equipped to emerge as a global AI leader. Now the government and business community must translate these strengths into concrete results.
Mickey Mikitani is founder, chairman and CEO of Rakuten Group.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
RSS