Pessimism about artificial intelligence (AI) abounds, with many fearing widespread job losses, soaring inequality and even the creation of deadly machines. However, in Japan one finds marked optimism. We believe AI would help our country to overcome acute labor shortages, improve people’s daily lives and recover global tech leadership.
According to an Ipsos survey, one-quarter of Japanese feel anxious about AI’s predicted impact on their lives — the lowest share of the 32 countries surveyed. Only about one in 10 Japanese believe AI would make the future worse, a far cry from the more than one-third of Americans who are pessimistic about the technology.
This divergence reflects several factors, but one of the most important might be Japan’s long history of working with machines. It is easy for us to imagine AI-powered applications and devices that aid, not replace, humans. At a time when Japan’s labor pool is shrinking — 30 percent of Japanese are already aged 65 and older — AI labor savings would be key to boosting productivity and saving critical industries.
It is with this future in mind that my company, Rakuten Group, has invested in developing large language models and small language models optimized for the Japanese language and culture. We are using AI to transform critical services, such as mobile networks. Instead of the vendor-locked, hardware-centric networks of the past, Rakuten Mobile’s network makes flexible systems possible, enabling operators to mix and match components, while also minimizing energy consumption. Potential glitches are reported, reviewed, and fixed — all at a distance. Software upgrades are pushed out frequently. The network “learns” and makes fixes autonomously.
This innovation depends on an enabling regulatory environment. Fortunately, Japan has so far taken an “innovation-first” approach to AI governance. Japan’s AI Promotion Act, passed last year, imposes no stringent rules or penalties that could stifle AI adoption or experimentation, and creates space for close cooperation between the public and private sectors. As noted in a 2024 white paper, the goal is to make Japan the world’s “most AI-friendly country.”
This contrasts with the EU’s focus on mitigating risks, reflected not only in its 2024 AI Act, but also in rules that limit access to data AI developers need. Other AI innovators lag behind Japan when it comes to establishing supportive environments. Some emphasize social stability and state-directed innovation, while others are bogged down by long legal battles between rights-holders and AI developers.
Japan’s AI optimism translates into AI-friendly policies. Japanese courts interpret our copyright framework to allow the use of third-party copyrighted works for training AI models. This access to data attracts leading US frontier AI firms, such as OpenAI, to collaborative efforts with Japan-based companies like mine.
To be sure, Japan recognizes the importance of ensuring the safe development of AI. It was under Japan’s presidency that the G7 launched its Hiroshima AI Process, aimed at promoting “safe, secure, and trustworthy AI worldwide” and providing “guidance for organizations developing and using the most advanced AI systems.” However, the resulting framework focuses not on stifling regulations or threats of fines. Instead, it aims to help companies design effective risk-management mechanisms and encourages transparent information-sharing and reporting.
While Japan’s AI-friendly approach is already bearing fruit, there are pitfalls the country must avoid. For starters, Japan must encourage wider adoption of AI tools: As it stands, only half of Japanese firms are using generative AI, compared with more than 90 percent in the US, China and Germany.
Japan must also avoid getting so hung up on small-scale AI adoption that we lose sight of the bigger picture — namely, the critical importance of generating our own global AI leaders. We must strengthen our energy and cloud infrastructure, investing in electricity production (preferably from clean sources), and accelerating data center permitting. We should avoid being swept up by counterproductive notions of “digital sovereignty,” instead encouraging Japanese innovators to collaborate with frontier firms from the US and elsewhere.
With our highly skilled population, supportive regulatory environment and openness to AI, Japan is well equipped to emerge as a global AI leader. Now the government and business community must translate these strengths into concrete results.
Mickey Mikitani is founder, chairman and CEO of Rakuten Group.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS