Pessimism about artificial intelligence (AI) abounds, with many fearing widespread job losses, soaring inequality and even the creation of deadly machines. However, in Japan one finds marked optimism. We believe AI would help our country to overcome acute labor shortages, improve people’s daily lives and recover global tech leadership.
According to an Ipsos survey, one-quarter of Japanese feel anxious about AI’s predicted impact on their lives — the lowest share of the 32 countries surveyed. Only about one in 10 Japanese believe AI would make the future worse, a far cry from the more than one-third of Americans who are pessimistic about the technology.
This divergence reflects several factors, but one of the most important might be Japan’s long history of working with machines. It is easy for us to imagine AI-powered applications and devices that aid, not replace, humans. At a time when Japan’s labor pool is shrinking — 30 percent of Japanese are already aged 65 and older — AI labor savings would be key to boosting productivity and saving critical industries.
It is with this future in mind that my company, Rakuten Group, has invested in developing large language models and small language models optimized for the Japanese language and culture. We are using AI to transform critical services, such as mobile networks. Instead of the vendor-locked, hardware-centric networks of the past, Rakuten Mobile’s network makes flexible systems possible, enabling operators to mix and match components, while also minimizing energy consumption. Potential glitches are reported, reviewed, and fixed — all at a distance. Software upgrades are pushed out frequently. The network “learns” and makes fixes autonomously.
This innovation depends on an enabling regulatory environment. Fortunately, Japan has so far taken an “innovation-first” approach to AI governance. Japan’s AI Promotion Act, passed last year, imposes no stringent rules or penalties that could stifle AI adoption or experimentation, and creates space for close cooperation between the public and private sectors. As noted in a 2024 white paper, the goal is to make Japan the world’s “most AI-friendly country.”
This contrasts with the EU’s focus on mitigating risks, reflected not only in its 2024 AI Act, but also in rules that limit access to data AI developers need. Other AI innovators lag behind Japan when it comes to establishing supportive environments. Some emphasize social stability and state-directed innovation, while others are bogged down by long legal battles between rights-holders and AI developers.
Japan’s AI optimism translates into AI-friendly policies. Japanese courts interpret our copyright framework to allow the use of third-party copyrighted works for training AI models. This access to data attracts leading US frontier AI firms, such as OpenAI, to collaborative efforts with Japan-based companies like mine.
To be sure, Japan recognizes the importance of ensuring the safe development of AI. It was under Japan’s presidency that the G7 launched its Hiroshima AI Process, aimed at promoting “safe, secure, and trustworthy AI worldwide” and providing “guidance for organizations developing and using the most advanced AI systems.” However, the resulting framework focuses not on stifling regulations or threats of fines. Instead, it aims to help companies design effective risk-management mechanisms and encourages transparent information-sharing and reporting.
While Japan’s AI-friendly approach is already bearing fruit, there are pitfalls the country must avoid. For starters, Japan must encourage wider adoption of AI tools: As it stands, only half of Japanese firms are using generative AI, compared with more than 90 percent in the US, China and Germany.
Japan must also avoid getting so hung up on small-scale AI adoption that we lose sight of the bigger picture — namely, the critical importance of generating our own global AI leaders. We must strengthen our energy and cloud infrastructure, investing in electricity production (preferably from clean sources), and accelerating data center permitting. We should avoid being swept up by counterproductive notions of “digital sovereignty,” instead encouraging Japanese innovators to collaborate with frontier firms from the US and elsewhere.
With our highly skilled population, supportive regulatory environment and openness to AI, Japan is well equipped to emerge as a global AI leader. Now the government and business community must translate these strengths into concrete results.
Mickey Mikitani is founder, chairman and CEO of Rakuten Group.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS