The US on Saturday last week moved swiftly and decisively to capture Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, bringing them to New York for trial. The shocking move by US President Donald Trump’s administration carries profound international strategic significance, most notably as it highlights the failure of the China model.
The legal and strategic rationales of Trump’s actions are clear: The operation was aimed at a security threat to the US, posed by what the White House characterized as state-sanctioned drug trafficking. Prior to the strike, the US spent months maneuvering and laying groundwork, with each stage of the process gradually unfolding before the world’s eyes.
This is not the bullying of a small country by a great power; the US is cracking down on drugs and dictators. The objective was clearly defined and the operation conducted with surgical precision. Afterward, the streets were full of Venezuelans celebrating Maduro’s downfall — the direct result of a carefully calculated strategy.
Beyond the two parties directly involved — the US and Venezuela — China’s presence is inescapable. A longtime supporter of Caracas, Beijing is the primary target of Washington’s warning. That Maduro was captured despite being under China’s protective umbrella underscores Beijing’s vulnerability and demonstrates its fundamental unreliability.
Venezuela is one of China’s largest military partners in South America, equipped with Chinese-made radar systems such as the JYL-1, air-defense systems, K-8 jets and armored vehicles. There have even been reports of Chinese military advisers operating in Venezuela, with the country’s military being touted as the strongest in South America.
Venezuela is also a recipient of training in Chinese military doctrine. However, reality has proven that in the face of the US military’s overwhelming electronic warfare, stealth aircraft and precision strike capabilities, the Chinese-made defense system was effectively useless — unable to detect or intercept US forces.
Trump’s action demonstrated that the US-based defense chain was successful under actual combat conditions.
Taiwan is a major user of advanced US weapons systems, including F-16V Block 20 jets, the Patriot air-defense missile system and the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System. By contrast, the catastrophic failure of Venezuela’s “China shield” and its disastrous defeat in actual combat illustrate the systemic vulnerabilities of Chinese equipment.
Furthermore, China has treated Venezuela as a key South American node in its Belt and Road Initiative, providing the Maduro regime with around-the-clock support across political, economic and diplomatic domains for years. Yet, when the US military launched its operation, Beijing did nothing beyond verbal protests — incapable and unwilling to intervene or militarily obstruct it.
Instead, it could only watch in shock and regret, exposing China as a paper tiger when it comes to being a “security ally.” The incident should serve as a stark warning for other pro-China countries in the region.
The most intriguing side of all of this is that, apart from Venezuela, the other country that has been repeatedly named, sanctioned and treated as a national security threat by the US for exporting state-backed opioids such as fentanyl is China. Now that the “junior” has fallen, how can the “senior” continue indulging in a drug lord’s regime without risking becoming the US’ next target? This is the dilemma Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) faces after the failure of the China model.
Tzou Jiing-wen is editor-in-chief of the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper).
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
Taiwan last week finally reached a trade agreement with the US, reducing tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15 percent, without stacking them on existing levies, from the 20 percent rate announced by US President Donald Trump’s administration in August last year. Taiwan also became the first country to secure most-favored-nation treatment for semiconductor and related suppliers under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act. In return, Taiwanese chipmakers, electronics manufacturing service providers and other technology companies would invest US$250 billion in the US, while the government would provide credit guarantees of up to US$250 billion to support Taiwanese firms