Nearly a week after US President Donald Trump first announced what he said was the first US ground strike in a four-month-long military pressure campaign against Venezuela, details remain very thin on the ground.
CNN and the New York Times on Monday reported that they confirmed the CIA had used a drone to target a “port facility” allegedly used by the Tren de Aragua street gang. No casualties were reported, but the date, time and location of the attack remain unknown.
Meanwhile, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his government have remained silent.
If confirmed, the first strike on land would mark a new phase in a campaign that since August last year has involved the deployment of a massive US naval fleet, airstrikes that have so far killed 107 people, a “total blockade” of sanctioned oil tankers, the seizure of two vessels and the pursuit of a third.
Independent organizations, activists and analysts in Venezuela have so far been unable to find any details of an attack.
Whether or not the strike even took place, analysts agreed that Trump’s announcement itself marks his latest move in a shadow war aimed at removing Maduro from power.
“Obviously, the US doesn’t want to call it a war, because that would trigger congressional oversight ... but it is a war, as people are dying — and they’re dying in a very explicit and loud way with these airstrikes on boats,” said Alejandro Velasco, a historian of modern Venezuela and a professor at New York University.
Maduro is also waging his own war to stay in power: “That’s the only thing he and the people around him are concerned about. For them, the war is about how to survive one more day,” he added.
Chatham House senior research fellow for Latin America Christopher Sabatini said the US is already running a psychological operations campaign against Venezuela.
“It’s not a war that involves massive amounts of weapons yet, because I think neither side has the stomach to do that... So it’s more of a war of moving of pieces and hoping one side folds,” he said.
It is that logic that has driven all of Trump’s moves so far, from the military buildup to the attacks on boats and the seizure of oil tankers, Sabatini said.
“Trump’s entire plan hinges on the idea that someone in Maduro’s inner circle will defect and say: ‘Maduro, you’ll leave and we’re forming a new government.’ With every step, the US doubled down on that strategy, even though it didn’t work,” he added.
The alleged first strike on land would be Trump’s latest attempt in that strategy, Sabatini said.
Central University of Venezuela criminology professor Andres Antillano said it was “unlikely” that the strike, if it occurred at all, destroyed any significant drug infrastructure.
He is among several experts on Venezuelan drug trafficking who said that, despite initial US claims that the military pressure is part of a so-called “war on drugs,” the country plays a relatively minor role in global cocaine trafficking — and is certainly not responsible for the most significant volumes reaching the US.
“There is an exaggeration of the Tren de Aragua, which is in fact very weakened and fragmented... If the attack really happened, it may have hit a small fishing village from which speedboats carrying cocaine depart,” Antillano said.
It could have occurred in an “isolated place, which is why nothing is known,” he said, adding that the Maduro regime also might not want to acknowledge the attack.
Venezuela took weeks to comment on the deadly airstrikes in the Caribbean, initially claiming the images were fake.
“In any case, even if everything Trump has said is true, it still seems to me an attack with minimal impact, despite its media coverage. That was more or less what happened with the airstrikes on boats: They led to the deaths of fishers, possibly some linked to drug trafficking, but they had no impact on drug trafficking itself nor did they shake the foundations of the Maduro government,” Antillano said.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS