This year, Taiwan-Indonesia relations continued their steady upward trajectory, driven by expanding economic cooperation, cultural and educational exchanges, and growing people-to-people ties — despite the enduring constraints imposed by Jakarta’s adherence to its “one China” policy. Against a backdrop of heightened cross-strait tensions and shifting geopolitical currents, both sides pursued pragmatic collaboration.
The relationship this year was defined by incremental deepening across three key areas: economic and commercial expansion, societal and soft-power engagement, and the regional geopolitical context.
Building on trade links, both sides renewed and expanded mechanisms to diversify cooperation. Late last month, Taipei and Jakarta signed two significant memorandums of understanding aimed at strengthening trade promotion and halal industry cooperation. The memorandums expanded collaboration into fisheries, processed food, household goods, medical devices, and creative and digital sectors. They also established frameworks for trade fairs, business seminars and industry dialogues.
Trade data from the first quarter showed a slight dip in overall bilateral trade, with modest contractions in Indonesian exports and Taiwanese imports. Nonetheless, cooperation remained resilient. Taiwan reaffirmed its role as a key partner for Indonesia, particularly in sustainable energy, healthcare and infrastructure investment.
Technology and innovation further symbolized deepening economic ties. At the Indonesia Technology and Innovation Expo, Taiwan made its debut with a pavilion showcasing 15 technology firms. The exhibition underscored Taiwan’s technological strengths, and Indonesia’s growing demand for digital solutions.
Agricultural cooperation also saw renewed momentum. Taipei announced plans to launch new agricultural programs in South Sulawesi and West Java focused on seed production and vegetable supply chain development.
Beyond economics, people-to-people engagement emerged as a central pillar of the relationship. Tourism diplomacy played a visible role, with the Taiwan Travel Fair in Jakarta targeting young Indonesians through lifestyle-oriented promotions and travel incentives.
In September, Taipei Economic and Trade Office in Indonesia officials visited Jakarta’s Antara Heritage Center to advance language, arts and heritage collaboration, reinforcing mutual understanding at the societal level.
Even as cooperation expanded, geopolitical constraints continued to shape the relationship. Indonesia reaffirmed its commitment to its “one China” policy, reiterating that it does not recognize Taiwan as an independent sovereign state. This position remained central to Jakarta’s diplomacy and limited political engagement. A viral leaked conversation involving Indonesian leadership highlighted sensitivities surrounding Taiwan-related issues, prompting a public response from Taipei.
Rising tensions in the Taiwan Strait and evolving US policy toward Taiwan added further complexity. US legislative and defense support shaped the strategic environment, which Indonesia monitored closely.
Taiwan-Indonesia relations this year demonstrated how pragmatism, economic interests and societal engagement can sustain meaningful cooperation without formal diplomatic recognition. While Jakarta’s “one China” policy remains unchanged, the expanding scope of unofficial ties signals a resilient and multifaceted relationship. As Indonesia navigates intensifying Asia-Pacific dynamics, its engagement with Taiwan is likely to remain a carefully calibrated blend of opportunity and caution.
Muhammad Zulfikar Rakhmat is director of the China-Indonesia Desk at the Center of Economic and Law Studies in Jakarta.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) was on Monday last week invited to give a talk to students of Soochow University, but her responses to questions raised by students and lecturers became a controversial incident and sparked public discussion over the following days. The student association of the university’s Department of Political Science, which hosted the event, on Saturday issued a statement urging people to stop “doxxing,” harassing and attacking the students who raised questions at the event, and called for rational discussion of the talk. Criticism should be directed at viewpoints, opinions or policies, not students, they said, adding
RSS