This year, Taiwan-Indonesia relations continued their steady upward trajectory, driven by expanding economic cooperation, cultural and educational exchanges, and growing people-to-people ties — despite the enduring constraints imposed by Jakarta’s adherence to its “one China” policy. Against a backdrop of heightened cross-strait tensions and shifting geopolitical currents, both sides pursued pragmatic collaboration.
The relationship this year was defined by incremental deepening across three key areas: economic and commercial expansion, societal and soft-power engagement, and the regional geopolitical context.
Building on trade links, both sides renewed and expanded mechanisms to diversify cooperation. Late last month, Taipei and Jakarta signed two significant memorandums of understanding aimed at strengthening trade promotion and halal industry cooperation. The memorandums expanded collaboration into fisheries, processed food, household goods, medical devices, and creative and digital sectors. They also established frameworks for trade fairs, business seminars and industry dialogues.
Trade data from the first quarter showed a slight dip in overall bilateral trade, with modest contractions in Indonesian exports and Taiwanese imports. Nonetheless, cooperation remained resilient. Taiwan reaffirmed its role as a key partner for Indonesia, particularly in sustainable energy, healthcare and infrastructure investment.
Technology and innovation further symbolized deepening economic ties. At the Indonesia Technology and Innovation Expo, Taiwan made its debut with a pavilion showcasing 15 technology firms. The exhibition underscored Taiwan’s technological strengths, and Indonesia’s growing demand for digital solutions.
Agricultural cooperation also saw renewed momentum. Taipei announced plans to launch new agricultural programs in South Sulawesi and West Java focused on seed production and vegetable supply chain development.
Beyond economics, people-to-people engagement emerged as a central pillar of the relationship. Tourism diplomacy played a visible role, with the Taiwan Travel Fair in Jakarta targeting young Indonesians through lifestyle-oriented promotions and travel incentives.
In September, Taipei Economic and Trade Office in Indonesia officials visited Jakarta’s Antara Heritage Center to advance language, arts and heritage collaboration, reinforcing mutual understanding at the societal level.
Even as cooperation expanded, geopolitical constraints continued to shape the relationship. Indonesia reaffirmed its commitment to its “one China” policy, reiterating that it does not recognize Taiwan as an independent sovereign state. This position remained central to Jakarta’s diplomacy and limited political engagement. A viral leaked conversation involving Indonesian leadership highlighted sensitivities surrounding Taiwan-related issues, prompting a public response from Taipei.
Rising tensions in the Taiwan Strait and evolving US policy toward Taiwan added further complexity. US legislative and defense support shaped the strategic environment, which Indonesia monitored closely.
Taiwan-Indonesia relations this year demonstrated how pragmatism, economic interests and societal engagement can sustain meaningful cooperation without formal diplomatic recognition. While Jakarta’s “one China” policy remains unchanged, the expanding scope of unofficial ties signals a resilient and multifaceted relationship. As Indonesia navigates intensifying Asia-Pacific dynamics, its engagement with Taiwan is likely to remain a carefully calibrated blend of opportunity and caution.
Muhammad Zulfikar Rakhmat is director of the China-Indonesia Desk at the Center of Economic and Law Studies in Jakarta.
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The