The “Taiwan Future Account” (TFA) bill, jointly promoted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party, proposes that the government establish an investment account for every child aged 12 or younger. The government would make an initial deposit of NT$50,000 for each child with a valid household registration, with an additional NT$10,000 contributed annually, alongside contributions from parents and their employers.
Designed as a policy to make preparations for future generations, its appeal is evident. However, there are several key concerns regarding the feasibility of the policy’s overall design in terms of long-term planning and intergenerational impact.
The first is fiscal. A NT$50,000 initial deposit might appear modest, but even as the birthrate declines and the number of children decreases, continuously budgeting for all eligible children every year would still constitute a substantial long-term financial commitment. Under the pressures of an aging population, declining birthrates and social welfare expenditures, it is unclear whether the government has clearly assessed funding limits, potential crowding-out effects or fiscal sustainability in the medium to long term.
Second is the nature of employer contributions. Under the law, employers’ responsibilities are based on labor contracts and work-related obligations, and do not involve financial planning for their employees’ children. If employer contributions are not mandated, but simply encouraged, their actual impact is likely to be negligible. If they become a statutory obligation, the cost could impact small and medium-sized businesses’ and traditional industries’ management, operations and staffing capacities.
A more reasonable approach could be to offer incentives for students to invest their allowances or New Year’s gift money into the account, which would also teach them about financial planning and help them develop saving habits by watching their assets grow — a skill that textbooks cannot teach.
Third is the stock market’s inherent investment risks. Long-term returns depend on economic growth and social stability, and history shows that there are periods of prolonged stagnation or market crashes. Under the TFA, would the government ultimately assume liability if the account suffers losses? The implications of financial risk and public trust in the policy cannot be overlooked.
Finally, the fund’s ownership and usage rights after the child turns 18 are still in dispute. If it belongs to parents or guardians, it would defeat the fund’s original purpose, but if it belongs to the child, a lack of mature decisionmaking skills at 18 could trigger clashes within the family. To reduce the potential for family disputes, the legislation should clearly specify whether the account is to be managed by the government or another designated authority, and at what ages and for what purposes withdrawals are permitted. It should prohibit parents and minors from independently accessing the account to prevent misappropriation or abuse.
The challenges ahead for the bill are not just in the technical details, but broader questions related to fiscal policy, industry, finance and family institutions. Ultimately, the value of public policy is never just about good intentions; it is about careful risk assessment, clear planning and sound legislation. Without proper deliberation, well-intended legislation might, due to poor planning, give rise to systemic problems that would be difficult to resolve in the future. For this reason, the legislative process must embrace open discussion as much as possible, avoid oversights and ensure comprehensive policy planning to secure the viability of this safeguard for future generations.
Dino Wei is an engineer.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
Taiwan-India relations appear to have been put on the back burner this year, including on Taiwan’s side. Geopolitical pressures have compelled both countries to recalibrate their priorities, even as their core security challenges remain unchanged. However, what is striking is the visible decline in the attention India once received from Taiwan. The absence of the annual Diwali celebrations for the Indian community and the lack of a commemoration marking the 30-year anniversary of the representative offices, the India Taipei Association and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center, speak volumes and raise serious questions about whether Taiwan still has a coherent India
Recent media reports have again warned that traditional Chinese medicine pharmacies are disappearing and might vanish altogether within the next 15 years. Yet viewed through the broader lens of social and economic change, the rise and fall — or transformation — of industries is rarely the result of a single factor, nor is it inherently negative. Taiwan itself offers a clear parallel. Once renowned globally for manufacturing, it is now best known for its high-tech industries. Along the way, some businesses successfully transformed, while others disappeared. These shifts, painful as they might be for those directly affected, have not necessarily harmed society
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this
RSS