US President Donald Trump’s decision to approve banned exports of Nvidia Corp’s powerful H200 artificial intelligence (AI) chips to China could turbocharge the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) technological ambitions, narrowing the US’ edge in military supremacy. Over time, this risks shifting the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific, the primary region in which Washington competes with Beijing for influence.
It’s still unclear how far the deal is going to go. Chinese regulators are reportedly keen to limit access to the chips to keep domestic developers on the path to self-sufficiency in semiconductor production. Trump says that President Xi Jinping (習近平) has responded favorably to the move. The plan would be for shipments to go to as-yet unspecified “approved customers.”
The shift away from tighter controls, if China approves this deal, could give the country crucial access to Nvidia’s second-most powerful AI processor, which is roughly six times more capable than the H20 chips available to it. It is an important tool for any country trying to push the frontier of AI, especially in military applications.
Illustration: Louise Ting
The stakes are clear for the PLA. Chinese military documents said that future warfare hinges on using AI to determine precision and lethality of military operations. Beijing believes that winning future wars depends not only on the largest fleets or longest-range missiles, but on the ability to sense, decide and strike faster than the enemy. This requires enormous computing capacity.
The country’s domestic semiconductor sector has made undeniable progress, but remains far behind the cutting edge. The PLA and its affiliated research institutes have repeatedly sought access to US chips through commercial procurement channels. A review of records by researchers at Georgetown University’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) shows the Chinese military purchasing Nvidia GPUs to develop AI-enabled systems.
There is a growing number of cases of restricted US chips being diverted illegally. Earlier this month, two Chinese nationals were detained for allegedly violating export control laws by attempting to smuggle at least US$160 million worth of Nvidia chips to China, the US Department of Justice said. A third, the owner of a Houston company, has already pleaded guilty. Prosecutors allege the network obscured the chips’ origin by stripping Nvidia labels and rebranding them under a fabricated name, including advanced H200 models.
Under China’s civil-military fusion strategy, which blurs the lines between civilian tech and defense, the PLA aims to integrate commercially available AI hardware into military systems, although there are likely obstacles to implementation, said Cole McFaul, senior research analyst at the Center for Security and Emerging Technology.
“It’s early days,” McFaul said, “But if the Chinese military is willing to work through the potential cybersecurity risks, we could see a world where the PLA is able to deploy highly capable AI systems for military-use cases. That would be very worrying for American power.”
Policy experts are sounding similar warnings. Allowing China access to chips such as the H200 risks accelerating Beijing’s military AI capabilities at a pivotal moment, said the Atlantic Council. Whatever the PLA can do today with constrained hardware, it could do far more — and far faster — with next-generation US technology. The Council on Foreign Relations said that exporting such chips could meaningfully erode the US lead in AI. Computing power is the key input in developing and deploying the most advanced systems.
Beijing is unlikely to want to appear dependent on US hardware as it pursues a multi-year push for semiconductor self-sufficiency. Officials might try to manage access carefully so that neither Nvidia nor any other form of US tech leads to strategic military dependency.
Still, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) has said that restricting exports to China would only accelerate Beijing’s domestic semiconductor push. He said that the PLA would not use US chips because of national security risks associated with US tech.
US policymakers face an uncomfortable reality: Denying China access to advanced chips raises costs and slows progress for a competing superpower, but does not halt it. Conversely, allowing access might speed its military modernization at a critical moment in the Beijing-Washington rivalry.
Putting in place stronger audits and traceability to ensure US-made or designed chips does not reach military-linked entities through intermediaries could be one way to circumvent the PLA’s civil-military fusion strategy. Working together to create coordinated rules on access with like-minded partners — in particular Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, who control almost the entire advanced semiconductor supply chain — could close loopholes that China exploits.
Whether Beijing wants an AI-empowered military force is a moot question. It does, and it is building toward one. The real question is how much Washington is inadvertently helping it along the way.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS