US President Donald Trump’s decision to approve banned exports of Nvidia Corp’s powerful H200 artificial intelligence (AI) chips to China could turbocharge the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) technological ambitions, narrowing the US’ edge in military supremacy. Over time, this risks shifting the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific, the primary region in which Washington competes with Beijing for influence.
It’s still unclear how far the deal is going to go. Chinese regulators are reportedly keen to limit access to the chips to keep domestic developers on the path to self-sufficiency in semiconductor production. Trump says that President Xi Jinping (習近平) has responded favorably to the move. The plan would be for shipments to go to as-yet unspecified “approved customers.”
The shift away from tighter controls, if China approves this deal, could give the country crucial access to Nvidia’s second-most powerful AI processor, which is roughly six times more capable than the H20 chips available to it. It is an important tool for any country trying to push the frontier of AI, especially in military applications.
Illustration: Louise Ting
The stakes are clear for the PLA. Chinese military documents said that future warfare hinges on using AI to determine precision and lethality of military operations. Beijing believes that winning future wars depends not only on the largest fleets or longest-range missiles, but on the ability to sense, decide and strike faster than the enemy. This requires enormous computing capacity.
The country’s domestic semiconductor sector has made undeniable progress, but remains far behind the cutting edge. The PLA and its affiliated research institutes have repeatedly sought access to US chips through commercial procurement channels. A review of records by researchers at Georgetown University’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) shows the Chinese military purchasing Nvidia GPUs to develop AI-enabled systems.
There is a growing number of cases of restricted US chips being diverted illegally. Earlier this month, two Chinese nationals were detained for allegedly violating export control laws by attempting to smuggle at least US$160 million worth of Nvidia chips to China, the US Department of Justice said. A third, the owner of a Houston company, has already pleaded guilty. Prosecutors allege the network obscured the chips’ origin by stripping Nvidia labels and rebranding them under a fabricated name, including advanced H200 models.
Under China’s civil-military fusion strategy, which blurs the lines between civilian tech and defense, the PLA aims to integrate commercially available AI hardware into military systems, although there are likely obstacles to implementation, said Cole McFaul, senior research analyst at the Center for Security and Emerging Technology.
“It’s early days,” McFaul said, “But if the Chinese military is willing to work through the potential cybersecurity risks, we could see a world where the PLA is able to deploy highly capable AI systems for military-use cases. That would be very worrying for American power.”
Policy experts are sounding similar warnings. Allowing China access to chips such as the H200 risks accelerating Beijing’s military AI capabilities at a pivotal moment, said the Atlantic Council. Whatever the PLA can do today with constrained hardware, it could do far more — and far faster — with next-generation US technology. The Council on Foreign Relations said that exporting such chips could meaningfully erode the US lead in AI. Computing power is the key input in developing and deploying the most advanced systems.
Beijing is unlikely to want to appear dependent on US hardware as it pursues a multi-year push for semiconductor self-sufficiency. Officials might try to manage access carefully so that neither Nvidia nor any other form of US tech leads to strategic military dependency.
Still, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) has said that restricting exports to China would only accelerate Beijing’s domestic semiconductor push. He said that the PLA would not use US chips because of national security risks associated with US tech.
US policymakers face an uncomfortable reality: Denying China access to advanced chips raises costs and slows progress for a competing superpower, but does not halt it. Conversely, allowing access might speed its military modernization at a critical moment in the Beijing-Washington rivalry.
Putting in place stronger audits and traceability to ensure US-made or designed chips does not reach military-linked entities through intermediaries could be one way to circumvent the PLA’s civil-military fusion strategy. Working together to create coordinated rules on access with like-minded partners — in particular Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, who control almost the entire advanced semiconductor supply chain — could close loopholes that China exploits.
Whether Beijing wants an AI-empowered military force is a moot question. It does, and it is building toward one. The real question is how much Washington is inadvertently helping it along the way.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
RSS