As the sun sank on the first day of Hanukkah on Sunday, people gathered at a playground facing Sydney’s iconic Bondi Beach for an event melding characteristically Jewish and Australian traditions: Free donuts, ice cream, kosher food, a petting zoo, face painting — and the main event, a menorah lighting.
What happened instead was unthinkable violence. Two gunmen stalked the beachside park raining gunfire into the crowd for more than 10 minutes, leaving 15 dead and 42 in hospital. Among those killed were a 10-year-old girl and Rabbi Eli Schlanger, head of Bondi’s Chabad mission.
The alleged shooters were a father and son. Sajid Akram, aged 50, was shot by police at the scene. Naveed Akram, 24, was taken to hospital in a critical condition. Naveed had been investigated six years ago over links to a Sydney-based self-proclaimed Islamic State terror cell, Australian Broadcasting Corp reported on Monday without saying where it got the information.
Illustration: Mountain People
Bondi — a suburb of low-rise apartments, multimillion-dollar family homes, and surfers strung between cliffs and sand on the azure waters of the Pacific — has been a center of Jewish life in Australia for more than a century.
As early as 1921, about one-third of Sydney’s Jewish community lived there and in neighboring suburbs in the city’s east, then a solidly working-class area. Thousands of migrants fleeing rising European anti-Semitism in the 1930s and 1940s joined them, building synagogues, social clubs and businesses.
In the years after World War II, billionaire property developers Frank Lowy and Harry Triguboff rose from, respectively, a Hungarian ghetto and Tianjin’s Russo-Jewish community to become two of Australia’s five richest people. Each has long-standing connections to the area and built up much of the neighboring suburb of Bondi Junction. One of the country’s most famous swimwear brands, Seafolly, was started in Bondi in 1975 by a Hungarian-born Holocaust survivor.
Bondi Beach has broader meaning to Australia, too. In an overwhelmingly secular nation, beaches represent something close to a sacred space. On the sand, there are no divisions of race, class or creed, and people from every corner of the planet can come together to barbecue, swim, sunbathe and socialize.
Sunday’s shootings feel like a conscious attack on both sides of that escapism: Australia as a physical refuge from political violence, and as a mental retreat from a world where polarization and hatred seem to be relentlessly rising.
The flip side was always a certain complacency. Jews fleeing the rise of Nazism in Europe were not always welcomed in a society whose official migration policy favored white northern Europeans until the 1970s.
The country has become increasingly polarized since the Hamas attack on a music festival in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, and Israel’s subsequent war in Gaza that has so far killed more than 70,000 Palestinians.
A report released earlier this month by the Executive Council for Australian Jewry found there had been more anti-Jewish incidents in the past two years than in the previous 10 put together, including the torching of vehicles, graffiti sprayed on synagogues and homes, windows smashed, and myriad incidents of verbal and physical abuse. In the past 12 months alone there have been 1,654 such incidents.
Just last month, police authorized a neo-Nazi rally on the steps of the New South Wales parliament building in which black-shirted thugs hoisted a flag reading: “Abolish the Jewish Lobby.”
Such hatred is spreading on every side. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese presides over a comfortable center-left hegemony that seems a world away from the far-right politics on the rise in Chile, France, Germany, the UK and the US. And yet the One Nation party, whose founder, Pauline Hanson, has vilified Asian, indigenous and Muslim people since the 1990s, would be the third-biggest faction in Australia’s House of Representatives if an election were held tomorrow, according to one recent poll.
There were 309 Islamophobic incidents in roughly two years through November last year, about double the rate of previous years.
Even Australia’s vaunted gun laws — passed in the wake of the 1996 Port Arthur shootings, in which a lone gunman killed 35 people — are looking increasingly threadbare. There are now more guns in the country than there were back then. The older of Sunday’s Bondi attackers had six firearms licensed to him.
The government has worked hard to halt the rising tide of anti-Semitic attacks, despite what some of its critics have alleged. It expelled Iran’s ambassador and three other diplomats in August after concluding that the country’s Revolutionary Guard directed at least two attacks, including the firebombing of a Jewish restaurant a few minute’s walk from Bondi Beach. Clearly, though, it has not been enough.
More can be done to investigate and prevent that, without violating Australia’s guarantees on free speech and civil liberties. A country that has just implemented a ban on most social media usage by under-16s also needs to take a hard look at how online platforms are being used to spread prejudice.
Let us not throw out the promise of safety and optimism that led people to gather at Sunday’s Hanukkah festival in the first place, though. If that tradition represents the triumph of light over darkness — the rededication of a sacred space despoiled by violence — then upholding that spirit now seems a fitting rebuke to this vile attack.
David Fickling is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change and energy. Previously, he worked for Bloomberg News, the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
More than a week after Hondurans voted, the country still does not know who will be its next president. The Honduran National Electoral Council has not declared a winner, and the transmission of results has experienced repeated malfunctions that interrupted updates for almost 24 hours at times. The delay has become the second-longest post-electoral silence since the election of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernandez of the National Party in 2017, which was tainted by accusations of fraud. Once again, this has raised concerns among observers, civil society groups and the international community. The preliminary results remain close, but both
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
The Taipei Women’s Rescue Foundation has demanded an apology from China Central Television (CCTV), accusing the Chinese state broadcaster of using “deceptive editing” and distorting the intent of a recent documentary on “comfort women.” According to the foundation, the Ama Museum in Taipei granted CCTV limited permission to film on the condition that the footage be used solely for public education. Yet when the documentary aired, the museum was reportedly presented alongside commentary condemning Taiwan’s alleged “warmongering” and criticizing the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government’s stance toward Japan. Instead of focusing on women’s rights or historical memory, the program appeared crafted