Taipei City Councilor Miao Po-ya (苗博雅) was attacked over her remark that school and work could “continue as usual” in the event of a war. The real issue with Miao’s statement was not her tone, but the reality — does the outbreak of war bring society to a complete halt? Observing history and contemporary events, the answer is quite clear — it does not.
Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, both countries’ societies have continued to function. Ukrainian society has continued to run under extreme conditions — classes have not been suspended and the civil service continues to operate. As long as the government continues to work, schools go on to have classes and businesses remain open, the nation stays alive.
Let us look to the Republic of China during the Chinese Civil War. At the time, my father-in-law was a student who fled from China’s Shandong Province. Together with hundreds of secondary-school students from seven schools, he retreated to Penghu under the leadership of school principal Chang Min-chih (張敏之).
Penghu Corps Command chief Li Chen-ching (李振清) intended to conscript the students and prevent them from continuing their studies. Chang argued with him, insisting that the students be permitted to keep attending school. For this, Chang was falsely accused of being a communist spy and was executed — an event known as the 713 Penghu Incident (七一三澎湖事件).
My father-in-law was not allowed to leave Penghu for Taiwan to resume his education until he was almost 30 years old, later becoming an elementary-school teacher. This painful lesson demonstrates that education did not cease during wartime — rather, it had to be defended to the death.
What is deserving scrutiny are claims that war would cause everything to collapse. This is not just pessimism — it is psychological warfare. If people are led to believe that fighting is useless and defending is pointless, society would give up. Such narratives weaken the will to fight back and allow fear to take the place of reason.
Modern warfare is no longer about indiscriminate, complete destruction. Under localized attacks, systems such as administration, healthcare, energy and education must all maintain a minimum level of operation. The ability to maintain order determines a nation’s resilience. War is not justification, but a test.
The key point of debate should not be whether Miao said anything wrong, but whether we are prepared to face reality. What is truly dangerous is not someone reminding us that society must keep functioning during war, but those who want us to believe that everything should come to a halt once war breaks out.
Shen Yan is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Taiwan no longer wants to merely manufacture the chips that power artificial intelligence (AI). It aims to build the software, platforms and services that run on them. Ten major AI infrastructure projects, a national cloud computing center in Tainan, the sovereign language model Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine, five targeted industry verticals — from precision medicine to smart agriculture — and the goal of ranking among the world’s top five in computing power by 2040: The roadmap from “Silicon Island” to “Smart Island” is drawn. The question is whether the western plains, where population, industry and farmland are concentrated, have the water and
The political order of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) first took shape in 1988. Then-vice president Lee succeeded former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) after he passed, and served out the remainder of his term in office. In 1990, Lee was elected president by the National Assembly, and in 1996, he won Taiwan’s first direct presidential election. Those two, six and four-year terms were an era-defining 12-year presidential tenure. Throughout those years, Lee served as helmsman for Taiwan’s transition from martial law and authoritarianism to democracy. This period came to be known as the “quiet revolution,” leaving a legacy containing light
RSS