A Bangladeshi court’s decision to sentence exiled former Bangladeshi prime minister Sheikh Hasina to death has done little to heal a nation scarred by her long rule and last year’s bloody crackdown against student-led, anti-government protests.
Families of the victims want her immediate execution. The government demanded her extradition from India, where she fled last year.
Her supporters have threatened unrest if her Awami League party, once the country’s largest, remains banned from elections in February, leaving Bangladesh unable to turn the page on one of its darkest chapters.
Moments after Tuesday’s ruling drew cheers in court, families of protest victims called for Hasina’s hanging. However, repeated attempts to extradite her from India have stalled, straining ties between the once close partners.
Her son, Sajeeb Wazed, has warned of massive violent protests if the ban on Awami League is not lifted — a showdown that could shake the nation of 170 million, disrupt its garment exports to global brands, and jeopardize an economy reliant on a US$4.7 billion IMF bailout. Last year’s protests, which the UN says killed up to 1,400 people, had already brought economic activity to a standstill.
“True justice will come only when the hangman’s rope tightens around her neck,” said Abdur Rab, whose son was killed during the protests, as he held a banner bearing a noose and the words “Killer Hasina.”
“Only then can we wipe this dark stain from our nation’s history,” he said.
Hasina, who ruled Bangladesh for 20 years, including 15 straight before she fled, called the verdict politically motivated “by a rigged tribunal established and presided over by an unelected government with no democratic mandate.”
The upcoming elections would mark a long-awaited return to democratic rule and are widely expected to bring the Awami League’s archrival, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, back to power. The two parties have alternated rule for generations.
Meanwhile, Bangladesh’s interim government, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus and representatives of student protesters, faces the task of seeking Hasina’s extradition.
After the sentence was handed down, the government told India that failure to return her would be “a highly unfriendly gesture and an affront to justice.”
“Under the existing extradition treaty between the two nations, this is a binding obligation for India,” the Bangladeshi Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement.
All previous efforts so far to persuade New Delhi to send her back have faltered.
New Delhi said it was committed to “the best interests of the people of Bangladesh, including in peace, democracy, inclusion and stability in that country. We will always engage constructively with all stakeholders to that end.”
An Indian government source said that extradition is a lengthy process requiring review of tribunal documents to ensure due procedure, fair representation and credible testimony.
India cannot act without these records, and exemptions to the treaty apply if the case appears political, the source said.
“They don’t have to be best of friends, but they cannot remain at loggerheads indefinitely,” economist and political analyst Jyoti Rahman said. “And as long as Hasina remains in India, it would be difficult for the Bangladesh government to normalize the relationship. [The] Indian establishment recognizes that as well. Something has to be done here.”
Political violence surged in Dhaka ahead of the Hasina verdict, with several crude bombs exploding on Sunday and 32 blasts reported on Wednesday last week alone, along with dozens of buses torched. Police have detained activists from Hasina’s Awami League over alleged sabotage.
Hasina’s son and adviser Wazed said Awami League supporters would block the national election if the ban on the party was not lifted.
“There will be massive protests ... there’s going to be confrontations,” he told Reuters from Washington. “My mother is in touch with all of our party leaders and activists who are in the country. I am in touch with them. We have hundreds of thousands of activists in the country. We have millions of supporters, tens of millions. They are outraged.”
The interim government said the Awami League remains under “legal proscription” for its role in last year’s violence, and was not doing itself a favor by its “incitement to violence.”
“The administration’s overriding goal is to protect life and property and ensure a peaceful environment ahead of elections,” a spokesperson said. “Law enforcement has been instructed to act with restraint, maintain proportionality and prioritize dialogue to prevent confrontation. The priority now is stability, justice for victims, and restoring democratic governance.”
For Aman Ullah, 24, who lost his sight during the protests, justice would only come with Hasina’s hanging.
“I cannot see anymore, but the day I hear she has been hanged will be a celebration greater than Eid,” he said.
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS