The relationship between poverty and climate vulnerability is undeniable. With worsening climate disruptions across Asia, the impacts are becoming more severe. The goals of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 1, No Poverty, and SDG 13, Climate Action, are closely linked. India and Taiwan, two different economies, but similar in ambition, have strong reasons to work together. Both face the challenge of protecting people from inequality and a changing climate while guiding growth toward sustainability.
India’s challenge is the scale of its development needs. Although it has lifted more than 415 million people out of multidimensional poverty between 2005-2006 and 2019-2021, climate stress threatens to reverse this progress. Nearly half the population relies on climate-sensitive sectors, such as agriculture and fisheries. Unpredictable monsoons, droughts and heat waves lead to food insecurity and lost incomes. India’s climate policy increasingly connects adaptation with livelihoods. The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act funds water conservation, afforestation and soil restoration, creating rural jobs and improving resilience. The Pradhan Mantri Kisan Urja Suraksha Yojana promotes solar pumps for small farmers, enhancing access to clean energy and boosting productivity.
Taiwan, while more urbanized and wealthier, faces similar challenges. Rising sea temperatures and stronger typhoons threaten coastal jobs, while rising energy costs risk increasing inequality. Taiwan’s 2050 Net Zero Pathway includes principles for a just transition, combining decarbonization with social inclusion. The National Climate Change Adaptation Action Plan (2023–2026) incorporates social protection and local resilience into its adaptation efforts. The NT$10 billion (US$318 million) Green Growth Fund invests in renewable industries and workforce training, ensuring that the green transition creates new jobs rather than replacing old ones.
By combining India’s scale with Taiwan’s precision, the two can drive climate-inclusive growth. Taiwan’s expertise in smart grids, recycling and circular design can support India’s electrification and waste management efforts. Partnerships between Taiwanese cleantech companies and Indian energy cooperatives could reduce costs and increase access for low-income households. India’s “Solar Village” projects could benefit from Taiwan’s solar and storage technologies, ensuring reliable off-grid power in remote areas.
Agriculture presents another opportunity. Taiwan’s research centers have developed heat-resistant crop varieties and precision irrigation systems for small farmers. Collaboration with India’s agricultural research institutions could improve water efficiency and yields, stabilizing incomes in regions prone to drought. This cooperation supports both SDG 1 and SDG 13 by securing livelihoods and reducing environmental pressure.
Social innovation also plays a key role in building climate resilience. In India, the Self-Employed Women’s Association has created micro-insurance programs that compensate informal workers for income lost due to climate events. Last year, 50,000 women in Gujarat and Rajasthan states received payouts related to heat through a climate-indexed program. Taiwan’s fintech industry could help expand such systems by offering low-cost, data-driven insurance for rural areas in India. Additionally, Taiwan’s community-based disaster readiness models could improve India’s cyclone warning system, which already protects more than 120 million coastal residents.
At the policy level, both countries can work to connect climate finance with poverty reduction. Taiwan’s green bond market, valued at more than US$19 billion, offers insights for India as it seeks to issue “social-climate bonds” for adaptation and rural entrepreneurship. Putting private money into small-scale climate projects would help the poorest people, who are also the most at risk.
However, cooperation will require overcoming institutional challenges. Taiwan’s exclusion from UN climate initiatives limits its participation, and India’s multilayered bureaucracy and federal structure slow efforts. Yet collaboration through research networks, think tanks and development finance can help navigate these issues. Joint involvement in Indo-Pacific climate forums and academic exchanges could foster a shared ecosystem of trust and innovation.
For India and Taiwan, taking climate action and tackling poverty are essential economic goals. Climate change affects the poor first, but climate action can help them most. When climate and poverty efforts support each other, they create resilience that endures beyond electoral cycles.
India and Taiwan should pursue a cooperative roadmap that connects clean energy for the poor, climate-smart agriculture, inclusive insurance and social finance. This partnership would show that environmental responsibility and human dignity do not compete, but rather support each other. By aligning their skills and shared values, India and Taiwan can demonstrate that the path to net zero is also a way out of poverty, providing the Indo-Pacific region with a practical model for equitable resilience in a warming world.
Sutandra Singha is an independent researcher with a doctorate in international studies from Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi, specializing in climate change.
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did
RSS