On Tuesday last week, the Italian senate introduced a motion calling on the Italian government to act through international institutions to protect the rights of Next Digital founder Jimmy Lai (黎智英), as well as those of pro-democracy activists imprisoned in Hong Kong. Lai has been held in solitary confinement since 2020 on charges of “sedition” and “collusion with foreign powers” under Hong Kong’s National Security Law.
With this initiative, Italy joins similar efforts by parliamentary bodies in the US, the UK and Australia, as well as the European Parliament urging Chinese authorities to release Lai on humanitarian grounds.
The motion followed a news conference at the Italian senate on Oct. 27 by Italian Senator Giulio Terzi to draw attention to the forthcoming verdict in Lai’s trial. There is a real risk that Lai could be sentenced to life imprisonment — a terrifying prospect given his serious health conditions, which have worsened during his detention, his lawyer said.
Participants in the news conference stressed the destructive impact of the censorship imposed by Hong Kong authorities on the “one country, two systems” principle, which was meant to safeguard the autonomy guaranteed by the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration.
In its World Press Freedom Index this year, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) ranked Hong Kong 140th out of 180 countries and territories. It ranked 135th last year, 80th in 2020, 70th in 2015 and 18th in 2002 — the first year of the RSF report. This year’s assessment says: “Once a bastion of press freedom, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China has suffered a series of unprecedented setbacks since 2020, when Beijing adopted a National Security Law aimed at silencing independent voices.”
At the EU-China summit in July, the EU reiterated its deep concern over the ongoing erosion of fundamental freedoms in Hong Kong, where China should honor its previous commitments, as well as the human rights situation in Xinjiang and Tibet, and the treatment of human rights defenders and minority groups. The European Parliament has repeatedly emphasized the importance of maintaining the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait.
One of the speakers at the conference was Lai’s son, Sebastien. In his remarks, Sebastien Lai referred to Taiwan, saying that in its past two presidential elections Taiwanese chose the Democratic Progressive Party candidates precisely because they had witnessed events in Hong Kong. For many in Taiwan, Hong Kong was the testing ground for the “one country, two systems” model often invoked in discussions about Taiwan — and the place where that promise was broken.
The motion to free Jimmy Lai is not only a call to liberate a man who has defended freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of assembly; it is also an appeal to China to act responsibly, foster peace in the Taiwan Strait and ease international tensions.
Matteo Angioli is secretary general of the Global Committee for the Rule of Law “Marco Pannella.”
A Chinese diplomat’s violent threat against Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi following her remarks on defending Taiwan marks a dangerous escalation in East Asian tensions, revealing Beijing’s growing intolerance for dissent and the fragility of regional diplomacy. Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday posted a chilling message on X: “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off,” in reference to Takaichi’s remark to Japanese lawmakers that an attack on Taiwan could threaten Japan’s survival. The post, which was later deleted, was not an isolated outburst. Xue has also amplified other incendiary messages, including one suggesting
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
RSS