A Chinese diplomat’s violent threat against Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi following her remarks on defending Taiwan marks a dangerous escalation in East Asian tensions, revealing Beijing’s growing intolerance for dissent and the fragility of regional diplomacy.
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday posted a chilling message on X: “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off,” in reference to Takaichi’s remark to Japanese lawmakers that an attack on Taiwan could threaten Japan’s survival.
The post, which was later deleted, was not an isolated outburst. Xue has also amplified other incendiary messages, including one suggesting that Japan would provoke an immediate Chinese retaliation if it attacked Chinese forces.
At the heart of the diplomatic firestorm lies Taiwan, a democracy that China claims as its own and Japan increasingly sees as a strategic partner.
Takaichi’s comments reflect a growing consensus in Tokyo: A Chinese invasion or blockade of Taiwan would not be a distant regional issue, but a direct threat to Japan’s national security. Japan’s southwestern islands lie perilously close to Taiwan, and any conflict could disrupt sea lanes, endanger Japanese citizens and destabilize the region.
However, Beijing views such statements as provocations. The violent rhetoric from Xue signals a shift from diplomatic rebuttal to personal intimidation — a tactic that undermines norms of international conduct and reveals the depth of China’s sensitivity on Taiwan.
The episode exposes the erosion of civility in international relations, especially when authoritarian regimes feel cornered. Threatening a foreign leader with decapitation is not just grotesque — it is a symptom of a deeper malaise: The weaponization of language to silence dissent and intimidate democratic actors.
It also raises questions about the limits of diplomatic immunity and accountability. Should a diplomat who issues violent threats remain in their position? Should host countries tolerate such behavior under the guise of free speech or cultural misunderstanding?
Japan’s response has been measured, but firm. Yet the international community must go further. Violent threats against elected leaders cannot be normalized. As Taiwan’s future hangs in the balance, democracies must stand together — not just in defense of territory, but of dignity, dialogue and the rule of law.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament-in-exile.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS