Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces.
The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat, especially one stationed in the country to which he was directing his ire. The Japanese government called it “extremely inappropriate,” while Beijing tried to distance itself by characterizing the post as “personal.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said that Xue’s comments, and similar remarks from Chinese officials, risked stirring up anti-Japanese sentiment among Chinese, and that it “cannot be treated as an isolated incident or just a personal remark.” US Ambassador to Japan George Glass wrote on X: “The mask slips — again.”
All of those statements are true, to one extent or the other.
The imagery of necks being cut is too evocative of the shock-and-awe tactics of the Imperial Japanese Army in Nanjing in 1937-1938 to discount the idea that Xue’s remark was rooted in the persistent national historical trauma in China over the awful legacy of the Nanjing Massacre. The 20th century’s wars in Asia continue to cast a shadow over this region.
The comments are a reminder that the sentiment behind them, while “personal,” exists widely in China, and in the Chinese establishment, exacerbated by nationalist rhetoric commonly stirred up in Chinese state media. They say much about the sensitivity in China over Taiwan, and the lack of confidence that the situation can be resolved if other regional actors become involved. The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) rhetoric of a peaceful rise is, as Glass said, a mask concealing pernicious intent.
The arrival of Takaichi, who has expressed goodwill toward Taiwan and an understanding of the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, as Japan’s new leader is to be welcomed. Unfortunately, there is a sense in which she has — to borrow from Xue’s ugly imagery — stuck out her neck, and left herself, if momentarily, vulnerable.
In an interview posted online by the US think tank the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Ryo Sahashi, a professor at the University of Tokyo’s Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia, talked about how much alarm Takaichi’s comments caused in Japan itself. Sahashi stressed that never before has any Japanese prime minister said out loud in the Diet that the Taiwan situation could be regarded as an existential threat to Japan, and in those conditions Japan has cause to exercise its right to collective self-defense. This was “completely new,” he said.
Sahashi also said that Takaichi should be careful about political enemies at home: Her Liberal Democratic Party is in a weak position after a poor showing in elections earlier this year for the upper and lower houses. At the same time, her Cabinet takes the Taiwan Strait situation seriously, with Minister of Defense Shinjiro Koizumi and Minister of Foreign Affairs Toshimitsu Motegi calling stability in the region extremely important, he said.
Legislators of all parties should take note of the CCP’s true nature, from which Xue’s comments momentarily allowed the mask to slip.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
An article published in the Dec. 12, 1949, edition of the Central Daily News (中央日報) bore a headline with the intimidating phrase: “You Cannot Escape.” The article was about the execution of seven “communist spies,” some say on the basis of forced confessions, at the end of the 713 Penghu Incident. Those were different times, born of political paranoia shortly after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) relocated to Taiwan following defeat in China by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The phrase was a warning by the KMT regime to the local populace not to challenge its power or threaten national unity. The
The Iran war has exposed a fundamental vulnerability in the global energy system. The escalating confrontation between Iran, Israel and the US has begun to shake international energy markets, largely because Iran is disrupting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway carries roughly one-third of the world’s seaborne oil, making it one of the most strategically sensitive energy corridors in the world. Even the possibility of disruption has triggered sharp volatility in global oil prices. The duration and scope of the conflict remain uncertain, with senior US officials offering contradictory signals about how long military operations might continue.