Last month, the UN confirmed that the world has failed to contain global warming to the Paris Agreement’s threshold of 1.5°C, sounding a death knell for global climate governance. This is no longer a future warning, but an immediate reality.
Humankind is facing a crossroads of existential consequence, and yet US President Donald Trump is instead pushing to expand fossil fuel policy and refused to send an official delegation to this year’s COP30 climate summit. The world’s largest economy and historical emitter, it seems, is stepping back from the fight.
These climate and political shocks come as dual blows to Taiwan, which is on the front line of the climate crisis and highly reliant on international trade. Alarm bells are ringing not just for the environment, but over national security and economic survival.
The destructive consequences of the Trump administration’s decisions are not just about US carbon emissions, but about their political reverberations. Institutions of global governance do not come easy, and the US’ absence has served to seriously undermine the Paris Agreement.
Against a backdrop of warming set to exceed the 1.5°C threshold, world leaders gathered at COP30 to discuss emergency response measures to “loss and damage.” The lack of US presence sends a clear signal that “America first” and barefaced energy nationalism are prioritized above any principle of shared global responsibility.
There is a danger of major developing countries holding up US inaction as an excuse to delay their own decarbonization, and that the undercutting of global climate finance commitments would push vulnerable nations in need of adaptation funding into further precarity. The cooling effect of the US breaking ranks on international cooperation is unmistakable.
In Taiwan, we cannot afford to view the crisis as the business of other countries. A breach of 1.5°C of warming constitutes a direct and immediate threat to Taiwan’s survival. Powerful typhoons and floods are set to become a regular occurrence, while high temperatures and extreme dry periods threaten key sectors, including agriculture and the semiconductor industry, which require stable supplies of electricity and water.
The UN’s admission of failure means that it is time for Taiwan to take its plans for domestic adaptation and building resilience to a wartime level of urgency. There is no time for empty talk about net zero by 2050 — we must confront the imminent climate shocks now.
As our most important political ally, the US’ choice to step back and embrace fossil fuels would inevitably embolden domestic voices calling to slow down emission reductions to protect the economy. Going down this road would only further isolate Taiwan economically. The US might have abandoned the fight, but the EU stands ready and waiting as the world’s largest single market, armed with its Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) as an economic goad. Being an export-oriented country, Taiwan’s key industries of steel, petrochemicals and electronic components tie it to the EU’s green supply chain.
If Taiwan chooses to follow the US’ lead, it can expect to face high EU carbon taxes and exclusion from the supply chains of international brands like Apple and Microsoft, which are bound by environmental, social, and governance commitments. These economic ramifications are too great for Taiwan to ignore.
Facing climate breakdown and the crumbling of political leadership, Taiwan’s response must be focused and determined. We cannot allow for distractions or wishful thinking, and we must recognize that a net zero transition is no longer just an environmental issue, but one of economic survival and national security.
First, the government must resist internal pressure and accelerate its deployment of renewable energy, in particular in geothermal, biomass and energy storage systems to ensure a stable transition.
Second is to transform and upgrade industry — the government must shift from across-the-board subsidies to mandatory transitional guidance for carbon-intensive industries to adopt new technologies and comply with CBAM standards.
Finally, climate resilience must become a core principle of all public development projects. From the urban “sponge city” concept to disaster-warning systems in rural areas, public infrastructure and engineering projects must be reimagined to fully reflect the reality of a world having broken the 1.5°C threshold.
The US’ move is a gamble that Taiwan cannot afford to make. This moment of global disorder is exactly the point at which Taiwan must demonstrate its resilience and ability to turn the crisis into an opportunity for transformational change.
Chen Jie-an is a legal specialist for a technology corporation.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS