When presidential adviser Lin Hsin-i (林信義), Taiwan’s envoy to this year’s APEC summit in South Korea, arrived at the opening session on Friday last week, the official broadcast screen bore the name “Taiwan.” Also featured were the national flag, the labels “major economic partner” and “chips sector competitor,” as well as population and GDP statistics of 23.3 million and US$805 billion.
It is more than just a new look — it is an open acknowledgement of Taiwan’s economic strength and technological standing. As host, South Korea has delivered a tactful and economically minded framing, reflecting the pragmatic recognition of Taiwan’s role amid a global supply chain restructuring and growing geopolitical risks.
In 1991, Taiwan joined APEC under the name “Chinese Taipei” and has long been constrained by China’s enforcement of its “one China” principle. Although historically permitted to attend, everything from Taiwan’s name, flag and official wording has been subject to Chinese-enforced restrictions and obfuscations. For APEC’s media broadcast to display the name “Taiwan” and the national flag is more than a diplomatic nicety.
It is also not an actual political concession, but is a pivot to face economic reality. Taiwan holds a more than 60 percent share in the global wafer foundry business, and its semiconductors are an indispensable part of the global supply chain. South Korean firms, such as Samsung Electronics Co and SK Hynix Inc, are highly dependent on Taiwan’s industrial network, which incentivizes South Korea to show its respect and cooperative attitude toward Taiwan on the global stage.
The image of Lin greeting South Korean President Lee Jae-myung with the on-screen labels was striking — a true breakthrough moment for the optics and language surrounding Taiwan at APEC. The scene of diplomacy served as a boost for Taiwan’s visibility and as an expression of its industry-driven soft power. Domestically, the moment was reported as not only indicative of South Korea’s open-mindedness, but also that Taiwan’s technological strength is now reshaping international media narratives. As the world faces twin strategic competition challenges over chips in the artificial intelligence (AI) and energy sectors, Taiwan’s role is shifting from that of a passive participant to a key driver in the global restructuring.
Public opinion in the US, Japan and Europe has widely seen the shift as a reappraisal of Taiwan’s position by nations in the Asia-Pacific region. US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent was also present, with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) arriving last — the pair’s noticeable lack of interaction was in clear contrast to the scene of Lee and Lin. Chinese state media quietly reiterated its “one China” principle, while South Korean media talked up the professional neutrality of the host.
The interdependency between Taiwan and South Korea in semiconductor cooperation amid increasing global concern over supply chain security affirms a genuine strategic depth to an otherwise symbolic breakthrough moment. No longer just an observer of geopolitics, Taiwan has emerged as a stabilizing pillar of the regional economy.
For Taiwan, the moment is a symbol of sovereignty, international recognition and industry competitiveness. Lin’s speech focused on human-centered AI development and industry collaboration, successfully impressing upon the audience an image of Taiwan’s resilience and relevant contributions.
Domestically, it is likely to spark a re-examination of the relationship between diplomacy and economics, and a pragmatic appreciation of industry as diplomatic leverage to expand participation in multilateral frameworks — for instance, advancing membership of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, or deepening Taiwan-US trade agreements. Taiwan must maintain momentum with a practical and low-profile approach, while guarding against potential countermeasures from China.
The visual turnaround of Taiwan’s representation at the APEC summit was evidence that Taiwan’s economic strength transcends its constraints on nomenclature, and of its indispensable role as partner and competitor in the Asia-Pacific region.
Edwin Yang is an associate professor at National Taiwan Normal University and chairman of the Central Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030