When presidential adviser Lin Hsin-i (林信義), Taiwan’s envoy to this year’s APEC summit in South Korea, arrived at the opening session on Friday last week, the official broadcast screen bore the name “Taiwan.” Also featured were the national flag, the labels “major economic partner” and “chips sector competitor,” as well as population and GDP statistics of 23.3 million and US$805 billion.
It is more than just a new look — it is an open acknowledgement of Taiwan’s economic strength and technological standing. As host, South Korea has delivered a tactful and economically minded framing, reflecting the pragmatic recognition of Taiwan’s role amid a global supply chain restructuring and growing geopolitical risks.
In 1991, Taiwan joined APEC under the name “Chinese Taipei” and has long been constrained by China’s enforcement of its “one China” principle. Although historically permitted to attend, everything from Taiwan’s name, flag and official wording has been subject to Chinese-enforced restrictions and obfuscations. For APEC’s media broadcast to display the name “Taiwan” and the national flag is more than a diplomatic nicety.
It is also not an actual political concession, but is a pivot to face economic reality. Taiwan holds a more than 60 percent share in the global wafer foundry business, and its semiconductors are an indispensable part of the global supply chain. South Korean firms, such as Samsung Electronics Co and SK Hynix Inc, are highly dependent on Taiwan’s industrial network, which incentivizes South Korea to show its respect and cooperative attitude toward Taiwan on the global stage.
The image of Lin greeting South Korean President Lee Jae-myung with the on-screen labels was striking — a true breakthrough moment for the optics and language surrounding Taiwan at APEC. The scene of diplomacy served as a boost for Taiwan’s visibility and as an expression of its industry-driven soft power. Domestically, the moment was reported as not only indicative of South Korea’s open-mindedness, but also that Taiwan’s technological strength is now reshaping international media narratives. As the world faces twin strategic competition challenges over chips in the artificial intelligence (AI) and energy sectors, Taiwan’s role is shifting from that of a passive participant to a key driver in the global restructuring.
Public opinion in the US, Japan and Europe has widely seen the shift as a reappraisal of Taiwan’s position by nations in the Asia-Pacific region. US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent was also present, with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) arriving last — the pair’s noticeable lack of interaction was in clear contrast to the scene of Lee and Lin. Chinese state media quietly reiterated its “one China” principle, while South Korean media talked up the professional neutrality of the host.
The interdependency between Taiwan and South Korea in semiconductor cooperation amid increasing global concern over supply chain security affirms a genuine strategic depth to an otherwise symbolic breakthrough moment. No longer just an observer of geopolitics, Taiwan has emerged as a stabilizing pillar of the regional economy.
For Taiwan, the moment is a symbol of sovereignty, international recognition and industry competitiveness. Lin’s speech focused on human-centered AI development and industry collaboration, successfully impressing upon the audience an image of Taiwan’s resilience and relevant contributions.
Domestically, it is likely to spark a re-examination of the relationship between diplomacy and economics, and a pragmatic appreciation of industry as diplomatic leverage to expand participation in multilateral frameworks — for instance, advancing membership of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, or deepening Taiwan-US trade agreements. Taiwan must maintain momentum with a practical and low-profile approach, while guarding against potential countermeasures from China.
The visual turnaround of Taiwan’s representation at the APEC summit was evidence that Taiwan’s economic strength transcends its constraints on nomenclature, and of its indispensable role as partner and competitor in the Asia-Pacific region.
Edwin Yang is an associate professor at National Taiwan Normal University and chairman of the Central Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS