Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崐萁) organized a meeting at the Dahua Activity Center in Hualien County’s Guangfu Township (光復) to discuss post-disaster reconstruction efforts following the flood caused by the overflowing of a barrier lake in the Mataian River (馬太鞍溪).
The meeting — which should have been transparent and open to the public — was kept a secret, and only those friendly to Fu were informed that it was taking place.
Meanwhile, hundreds of Guangfu residents — the actual victims of the disaster — were locked outside.
Closed door meetings are meant for discussions that include secret or confidential topics that are unsuitable for public disclosure. They are meetings limited to discussion among specific authorized people.
Is a meeting on post-disaster reconstruction efforts confidential? Why limit attendance to county government personnel, local representatives, village chiefs and a few disaster victims?
Following the flood, Guangfu was left covered in a thick layer of black mud. People from across the nation, civilians and officials, contributed time and resources to assist in cleanup efforts.
Why, then, were disaster victims and volunteers not invited to the meeting? Could it be that the meeting was fake? Was it merely an attempt to put on a political show?
In December last year, when opposition legislators led a preliminary review of amendments to the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) that raised the threshold for a recall, KMT legislators held the meeting in secret and blocked the doors to physically prevent Democratic Progressive Party legislators from entering the room.
The meeting was originally meant to be attended by all legislators and journalists, who were abruptly locked outside. Looking back, that incident is very similar to Fu’s closed-door meeting.
In a shocking gesture, independent Hualien County Council Speaker Chang Chun (張峻) burst into the hall and kicked the table where Fu was sitting.
The KMT has long drifted away from the days of openness and transparency — closed-door meetings have already become the norm.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a civil servant.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS