Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崐萁) organized a meeting at the Dahua Activity Center in Hualien County’s Guangfu Township (光復) to discuss post-disaster reconstruction efforts following the flood caused by the overflowing of a barrier lake in the Mataian River (馬太鞍溪).
The meeting — which should have been transparent and open to the public — was kept a secret, and only those friendly to Fu were informed that it was taking place.
Meanwhile, hundreds of Guangfu residents — the actual victims of the disaster — were locked outside.
Closed door meetings are meant for discussions that include secret or confidential topics that are unsuitable for public disclosure. They are meetings limited to discussion among specific authorized people.
Is a meeting on post-disaster reconstruction efforts confidential? Why limit attendance to county government personnel, local representatives, village chiefs and a few disaster victims?
Following the flood, Guangfu was left covered in a thick layer of black mud. People from across the nation, civilians and officials, contributed time and resources to assist in cleanup efforts.
Why, then, were disaster victims and volunteers not invited to the meeting? Could it be that the meeting was fake? Was it merely an attempt to put on a political show?
In December last year, when opposition legislators led a preliminary review of amendments to the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) that raised the threshold for a recall, KMT legislators held the meeting in secret and blocked the doors to physically prevent Democratic Progressive Party legislators from entering the room.
The meeting was originally meant to be attended by all legislators and journalists, who were abruptly locked outside. Looking back, that incident is very similar to Fu’s closed-door meeting.
In a shocking gesture, independent Hualien County Council Speaker Chang Chun (張峻) burst into the hall and kicked the table where Fu was sitting.
The KMT has long drifted away from the days of openness and transparency — closed-door meetings have already become the norm.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a civil servant.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
RSS